Hey Piotr,
The HF20 may have good intentions and technicalities but what was silly was the implementation. How could you plan an implementation with the entire platform going Kaput for a week? It was just divine intervention that the price of Steem did not fall.
I was wondering and raised this point in different forums, both on and off Steemit, is whether a sandboxing was done before the actual implementation. I am not quite certain because just a few weeks before the HF20, the platform was off for a while. That again was for the HF20 implementation. So, no learning from past mistakes, I guess.
That said, the only visible change, like you pointed out, is the "Hide Resteem" function. This would be helpful when you have to quickly check your own old article and save yourself the time of going through resteems and your articles. The other advantage, of course, is for people who want to participate in some competition and one of the requirement is to resteem the post. So, while they do the resteem, they can hide it from their main page. Works in such conditions.
hi @oivas
Thank you for your amazing feedback. Appreciate it a lot.
hahaha I love the way you described it.
Cheers, Piotr
Hahhahah, that was just emotions flowing Piotr. Was paying little attention to the language I was using - German or English.
Well, just one more thing I noticed. If keeping my Voting Power at 0.01, I can vote till 80% of my VP, after which the VP goes below 0.01. However, regenerating 100% from 80% takes way more time than reaching 100% from (say) 90%. In other words, the closer the regeneration from 100% the faster it is and conversely, the farther from 100% to recharge, the more time it takes... I haven't noticed anyone reporting this as an issue, so I presume its only my experience then.
interesting ....
I had to re-read it @oivas to fully understand what you ment. do you still have similar impression about regenerating RC?
Guess what @crypto.piotr, even I had to read a few times more... Lol.. I think it has to do with the speed of regeneration if you go on a voting spree. So, calls for users to be responsible in voting and not just spam with votes, even if the votes are worth nothing.
Then again, I am not sure if this the intended function of the HF20 or just an aberration of an experience on my part. I haven't voted below 90% anytime after that, so not sure. Maybe, if I do get into a voting spree I will check if I have the same experience.