There is ZERO excuse for how he acted in this interview. That was the most incredibly arrogant display I think I've ever seen. That's not even mentioning his arrogance towards Andreas for not having enough money in BTC.
Honestly, I would ask him how he can ever think it's appropriate to judge and criticize people based upon their wealth? I'd like to hear him explain that..
Also ask him if he'll donate an equivalent amount of BCH to Andreas as others have done with BTC since.
Seriously. Roger and I don't agree on everything, but did you even notice what got him so triggered? It took a great deal to push him over that edge. Good job of the "interviewer" trolling him both before, during and after the "interview"/"debate".
No he shouldn't have done it. But the arrogance on the other side was no less.
All I can say is that Roger gave us a very clear glimpse into his deeper character. Enough that I never want anything to do with Roger or Bcash.
He has a temper, sure. Maybe legit anger issues even. I've seen much worse though and again don't forget about the interviewer, that guy obviously is not a good guy. Same goes for someone like Richard Heart etc etc.
For all the shit that people give Roger, he has taken a lot of it especially these last few years without any outburst what so ever. Still, I'm not here to always defend him, but lets be fair to all participants in the debate. Give shit based on merit if their is shit to be handed out.