Yeah, @ausbitbank being the social justice warrrior pest as usual! @craig-grant has already left the building due to flagging on Bitconnect. It's getting crazy on here! No one can say anything these days (good or bad!)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Come on, you can't possibly think losing Craig-Graint is a bad thing. That dude is a referral code pushing cancer. He knows damn well that every one of his lemming followers will lose money on mining contracts and the scam-coins he pushes, but he still does it.
When he's not busy fucking people over, he's bragging about his $10K a month condo he paid for by being busy fucking people over.
I would legit punch that fucker in real life. I bet that fat ass would go down hard in the first.
You know Sargon would not want him deplatformed no matter how cancerous you may think he is - or how strong your left hook is! I'm gonna miss you when I leave here Lex. Stopping at 30K comments ... then I'm out!! Back to my Sargon vids and my peace :)
I'm not sure about that. I think he's an actual scammer. I think Sargon would support deplatforming scammers, as these scams are generally illegal.
Two words: Ha ha!
uhm I disagree do not do that! Now you have to flag me... come on! I am talking to you, flag me if you are a man! :D Sorry I could not resist... uhm I can not see you like that.. mindhunter, I am goinf to missi you... I will have nobody to share my hate about corporations... uhm no... sigh sigh... and then you say I should not beg, and you threat like that it is unfair..
There are worse crimes than burning books. One of them is not reading them.
― Joseph Brodsky
[Time to leave the uwashed and and uneducated Ale.]
I do not have any power to change your mind, nor I will have force, but I am sorry dude
Shed no tears.
Daddys home!! :D
That's why I said I don't like Craig. From my subjective point of view he is acting unethical but I can't do anything. Is his choice, I don't think a downvote will change his mindset.
Agreed; much like other narcissistic sociopaths, he ignores all criticism and social convention.
Ethical or unethical as you find it @jwolf you have no right to censor his free speech.
I agree @mindhunter but do you think a downvote is censoring free speech?
P.S. Getting close to the 30K post ... and the end! ... I'll pass by as promised ;)
In all cases (with exceptions where life is endangered) YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [For those with high SPs who flag posts out of existence!]
We can't censor free speech man! That's an ilussion, nothing can stop us :D
I am happy for your achievement!
Ha ha!
steem pays my 10k rent :)
You mean your lemming followers that you push into what you know are money losing mining contracts pay your rent.
Your time till come.
I don't know the real reasons for those flags but I also disagree with some posts of Craig. Anyway that shouldn't be a reason to flag him but as I said we don't know their privat chat.
And you shouldn't be afraid to talk, if you know you're acting ethical you don't have to worry about nothing, there will always be haters & supporters :D
We must attack social justice warriors on Steemit whenever they censor free speech - even when we disagree with it! ... What is the alternative? 1984 in Steemit form? No thanks to all of that.
I don't know how to say 50% I agree with you but 50% with him, I mean as you have the right to the free speech, he has the right to the free downvote..you know what I mean?
Censorship should be consensus based and NOT staked based ... otherwise personal vendettas can occur to deplatform people with no fair trial, do you know what I mean? ;)
yes
DOUBLING DOWN ON THAT YES!!
It's all about being subjective in taking a decision of upvoting and downvoting man, there is nothing we can do about, it's just a like and dislike...
Agreed, but on a consensus model NOT on a staked model.
how can you prove it was on a staked model and not consensus?
To play devil's advocate, your alternative is simply tyranny of the majority instead.
Not taking a positions since I don't know what's better.
P.S. You make a good skeptical devil ;)
I think sometimes I should give it up. I get a lot of people coming at me rabidly because they think any position I point out some logic in means I'm a card-carrying holder of that position.
Removing censorship on Steemit (there are exceptions of course!) is not the tyranny of the majority ... it's the social contract in full working order ... and not some kinda SJW/An-cap shitty dog mess!
PS - You might like my response to your "friend" kooshikoo below. I wasted way too much time on it.
Why do you use social justice warrior as a derogatory term? That sounds like right-wing propaganda. Feel free to call me a social justice warrior, I will be honoured. But of course, I don't censor people, so it wouldn't fit your chosen narrative..
Social justice warriors use shame, guilt and censorship to censor others - I think you need to relook at your definition of a social justice warrior @kooshikoo - please don't ask for a safe space next.
P.S. Continuing your education ....
Social justice warrior" (commonly abbreviated SJW) is a pejorative term for an individual promoting socially progressive views,[1] including feminism,[1][2] civil rights,[1] multiculturalism,[1] and identity politics.[3] The accusation of being an SJW carries implications of pursuing personal validation rather than any deep-seated conviction,[4] and being engaged in disingenuous social justice arguments or activism to raise personal reputation, also known as virtue signalling.[5]
The phrase originated in the late 20th century as a neutral or positive term for people engaged in social justice activism.[1] In 2011, when the term first appeared on Twitter, it changed from a primarily positive term to an overwhelmingly negative one.[1] During the Gamergate controversy, the negative connotation gained increased use, and was particularly aimed at those espousing views adhering to social liberalism, cultural inclusiveness, or feminism, as well as views deemed to be politically correct.[1][2]
The term has entered popular culture, including a parody role-playing video game released in 2014 titled Social Justice Warriors.[6][7][8]
The term was not originally negative. It was turned pejorative because of propaganda.
And I don't need your education, thank you very much. Your tone is very condescending.
I have always been respectful towards you, but that is not reciprocal. You are unfollowed. Your posts are quite worthless anyway.
As if yours @kooshikoo, but I see your SJW shaming ways continue on ...
What lovely, intelligent remarks. You can call me what you want. I did not start this, and I have no interest in continuing. I was not condescending, at first. Now I am. This is a boring, worthless exchange of words, with no potential for dialogue, as you don't want dialogue.
So good riddance, and please refrain from any more mindless comments.
Ohnoes, you better run off then to some other platform that will pay you to spam and lie.
Yet more guilt and shaming from Steemit's #1 SJW: Mmmmmm ... what else did I expect??
Yet more dishonest behaviour and spam from steemits #1 dickhead. What else did I expect ?
Give it up @ausbitbank ... Oh I forgot! SJWs don't do that - they permanently shame and stick to their collectivist views like shit to a stick! Man up will you @ausbitbank!
P.S. You forgot to flag this post on free speech.