Censorship should be consensus based and NOT staked based ... otherwise personal vendettas can occur to deplatform people with no fair trial, do you know what I mean? ;)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Censorship should be consensus based and NOT staked based ... otherwise personal vendettas can occur to deplatform people with no fair trial, do you know what I mean? ;)
yes
DOUBLING DOWN ON THAT YES!!
It's all about being subjective in taking a decision of upvoting and downvoting man, there is nothing we can do about, it's just a like and dislike...
Agreed, but on a consensus model NOT on a staked model.
how can you prove it was on a staked model and not consensus?
Staked model = whales uses high SP to economically destroy free speech.
Consensus model = Consensus free of high SP decides what needs to be flagged.
mhm..ok. So what are your plans for future on Steemit?
CG told me it's time to jump from the Steemit train! Too much censorship!!
That's not an option man. Are you running?...
To play devil's advocate, your alternative is simply tyranny of the majority instead.
Not taking a positions since I don't know what's better.
P.S. You make a good skeptical devil ;)
I think sometimes I should give it up. I get a lot of people coming at me rabidly because they think any position I point out some logic in means I'm a card-carrying holder of that position.
Removing censorship on Steemit (there are exceptions of course!) is not the tyranny of the majority ... it's the social contract in full working order ... and not some kinda SJW/An-cap shitty dog mess!
PS - You might like my response to your "friend" kooshikoo below. I wasted way too much time on it.