You are right, bots don't have that capabilities for doing that "yet", in the other words, we will making people develop smartest bots each day by making harder for dumb bots to make money, this is a good and easy way to promote AI development and I support this idea.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
It is interesting to think of this as simply an AI arms race to producing the fully human-impersonating Steemit robot.
I think users that intelligently interact with other users will outperform bots in the long run. I'm pretty sure that @m3mt and @lexiconical are humans. That is why I follow them and would up-vote but can't afford the power right now.
Bots and humans that do not contribute value to a post will get a down vote if I could afford it. I'm looking forward to being able to divide my up-vote/down-vote so it don't deplete so fast. This feature should be more readily available for more users so that that non-valuable posts/comments get down-voted more.
Grammar is also very important. I am rarely going to follow/up-vote/reply to users that don't use proper spelling, punctuation and grammar - they should at least put some effort into it.
"Bots and humans that do not contribute value to a post will get a down vote"
Only if they are posting a target which can be flagged...
"Grammar is also very important."
I wish this were more generally true.
I'm going to have to disagree with you there, I'm pretty sure @lexiconical is at least a Vulcan or maybe a Metron.
I absolutely never hang out here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/totallynotrobots/