"I did not grant the point that there is no patriarchy"

My point is, you didn't mean to but you did anyway by conceding the government favors women. The opposite of the actual definition of patriarchy.

Feminists have just redefined the word Patriarchy to mean whatever they want. That is not the real definition of patriarchy.

1. a system of society or government in which the father or eldest male is head of the family and descent is traced through the male line.
2. a system of society or government in which men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it.
3. a society or community organized on patriarchal lines.*

"women are objectified"

It's demeaning to women and offensive that you list their having sex-appeal as a negative. It's also extremely naive, do you know how much society favors attractive people? If not, you might want to look into how Kim Kardashian and Paris Hilton both manage to never work a day in their life, yet live better than you and I combined.

You are the one denying the facts. The gender wage gap is a complete myth, which you would know if you bothered to watch the video I already linked you.

Only the ignorant and communists believe the gender wage gap lie (the 77% one), because they think all jobs should be paid the same.

Legitimate reasons women are paid less:

1. They don't negotiate as much for salaries. Proven fact, google studies. It is what it is.
2. They pick (of their own volition) low paying majors (like gender studies) with safe, easier jobs that pay less. They avoid Stem degrees, Petroleum jobs, etc like the plague. See image below, source US government (right click, open in new tab):

What do you think makes more, a kindergarten teacher or a boilermaker welder?

Frankly, I'm even more concerned at how much we'll be holding back humanity by continuing to subsidize degrees in "Human Services/Communty Org" (astroturing?) at the cost of "Math/Computer Science" and "Chemical Engineering". Women are lucky that the market isn't paying them far less already.

I dunno, the trend sure seems to be in women's favor, making 8% more than young men despite negotiating less and picking lower paid fields.

Hmm. It's almost as if continuing to lobby for more benefits for women (the advantaged class) at the cost of men (the disadvantaged class) by an organized group (feminism) now objectively qualifies as a supremacist movement.

Think very, very carefully before responding. You may want to let these facts sink in.