The Great Bots of Steemit (list)

in #steemit7 years ago (edited)

This is an incomplete list of steem voting bots with a brief description and a personal rating. It will be broken up into 3 categories: paid bots (e.g. randowhale), bid bots (e.g. drotto), and free bots (e.g. originalworks). Paid bots are bots where you pay a specific value and you will get a roughly predetermine value upvoted to your post, for instance pay 1SBD to get a 1.35 SBD return vote. Bid bots work very similarly except it works more of if you buy a vote by paying, you can get much larger votes when timed correctly, votes are not predetermine to much if any degree. Free bots are bots that upvote you with no cost to yourself (except potentially some bandwidth) but they may serve a secondary purpose sch as originalworks which can be use to signify the originality of a post. This post will not deal with bots like cheeta as I have no idea on how cheeta specifically upvotes, I do know it follows specific people and downvotes them though. This will also ignore certain things like certain curation bots (steemstem, curie) as they work by following curators to upvote good content, what I am looking at are bots that will upvote more than just specific realms of content. I will be including qurator on this list as, although it is a niche curration bot, it upvotes automatically. Lets get into it. Warning this post uses he/she interchangeably as bots (programs) tend not to not have genders, if this offends you then feel free to reply but realize that I am just using it because its easier for me to refer to bots like that over referring to "it". Ratings are arbitrary and made up by me, if you want a proper grading using a rubric then create one but many bots are so different that it would be extremely difficult to rate them on a single scale.



Sourced From Randowhale:

Used for educational purposes, could be seen as advertising.

@randowhale

Randowhale is known by many as a great tool and service, and also a horrible thing that promotes spam content. Many dislike randowhale and the complete idea behind it due to their disposition towards his creator (@burniesanders) but he is truly one of the original upvote bots and definitely the most well known. For a while randowhale worked by you sending him 2SBD and he would upvote a post at the same value plus some and you would generally get what you paid for back exactly (if not slightly less) but he worked. Now you can pay in batches of 0.5SBD up to 5SBD (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, ... , 4.5, 5.0) and you will get a vote proportional to what you paid with a chance of getting a bonus amount added (ike say paying 5SBD and getting a 12SBD upvote instead) which is nice. Whether you love or hate bernie (he doesn't care) you have most likely seen someone benefit from the service he provides steemit.

Ratings: 5/5



Source From Steemlike: Educational or advertising

@steemlike

So I have a bias towards steemlike which is that I get paid around 0.1 SBD every day from this account due to my delegation to it. Now lets get past that and talk about how steemlike works, first you pay them a value between 0.1SBD and 6SBD and you get an upvote equal to ~240% what you paid so if you pay 6SBD then you will get a ~14.4 SBD upvote. This is subject to change at their own choice. Why I truly like this bot is that it has a website that you can look at to determine the status of your upvote (pending complete, etc) and if you get a refund it will say why. The upvotes are a little bit slower than other bots but they also have more rules about the exact content they upvote. The website for the bot is located here and provides multiple accounts that will upvote you (@steemlike, @steemfunding, @parosai, @koinbot).

Rating: 4.7/5


@minnowpond

Minnowpond is a bot that used to (it might still) provide free votes for all whom follow it but provided much larger votes for those whom paid. A vote wold cost 0.25 SBD or 1.25 SBD for a larger vote but also provide a resteem service for 0.75 SBD. What this means is that following minnowpond lead to a large amount of crap posts in your feed as it would resteem anything. The votes were less likely to go negative when compared to randowhale (randowhale would upvote at 1.06 SBD and after curation would provide around 0.795 SBD value at a cost of 1SBD, thus negative) but its votes were small. That being said, they had some problems with their track record of posts not getting upvoted or resteemed. Although they have a discord channel, their help was quite unresponsive and lead to many stating it was a scam thogh once they update the bot it started to work again.

Rating: 2.3/5


@randofish

Randofish is another upvote bot whee you pay 0.25SBD and recieve an upvote between 20% and 80% or 100% if you pay 1SBD. Now as you can see, randofish is at a reputation of 0 ever since berniesanders (and his account army) decided to kill randofish since randofish was using randowhale as advertising. However, randofish still seems to upvote people and provide its service.

Rating: 3.5/5


Bid Bots

Bid bots work much differently from basic pay-per-vote bots and can even work differently fro each other. The basic idea of a bid bot is that a bunch of people send SBD to the bot and whomever sent the most gets the highest vote out of the bot and whomever votes the least gets the lowest vote. The defined maximum and minimum vote can differ exponentially depending on what the creator decides. What this means is you can bid higher than the bot can upvote or you could bid low and get a very large upvote. Some state that the reason that they use bidbots isn't even for the upvote value but rather for the reputation they gain from a whale upvoting their content. So lets get into some of the bid bots:



Dr Otto Avatar

@drotto

Dr. Otto is a bidbot that will upvote you between 0% and 3.13% every 270 seconds. He has a maximum upvote of 1.49 SBD but maximum bid upvote (at 3.13%) of 0.05SBD making him a bidbod for minnows. Now you may know of Dr. Otto from the minnow support project as the MSP account will actually call Dr. Otto when you use their upvote. He has low value and is meant for minnows but he still provides a service to the community.

Rating: 4.5/5


@upgoater

No longer a bidbot and may become a dormant bot very very soon. If anyone has more information feel free to add it here


@lovejuice

Before researching this topic, I didn't know about lovejuice. Lovejuice is a bot that was inititally made to flag steemit "circle-jerk" content and was turned into a bidbot after HF19 and can upvote at a max of around 20SBD. The other thing about lovejuice is its an erotic bot. Because of that no pictures will be provided so that I can keep this out of NSFW. I do not know enough about love juice to provide a meaningful rating but there is a minimum bid of 0.1SBD so yeah.



Source @booster

@Booster

Booster is a bot that splits its vote proportional to how much you voted compared to everyone else. So if you payed 50% of the total amount sent to booster within a bid period then you get 50% booster vote. A max booster vote (100, 100) is roughly 140.78SBD but it is unlikely that you will get the max.

More Bid Bots

These are bidbots that I either didn't know enough about or else are new.
@litasio
@boostme


There are more bidbots but if I were to go through every bot in each list this would be a very very long list since anyone can create a bot.


Free Bots (May Require Initial Fee)

These are bots that give you a free upvote (ignoring sign up fee) that can act as a boost to your reward. The value tends to be small for these bots and some might provide a secondary service.


@originalworks

Original works is a bot that will upvote a post at 1.5% if determined to be original, otherwise will provide a warning that the content is similar. I believe the bot is still WIP but it can still be a tool used to attempt to prove authenticity. Sometimes the bot responds super fast and at peak hours the bot can take hours to respond if it does at all.


@minnowsupport

This bot has a fee of 0.002 STEEM to register and it upvotes a post anywhere between 0.36SBD and 0.4SBD (including the votes of those whom trail the account) as well as it calls Dr Otto. The bot allows minnows to get a small amount of support (and it truly does help minnows) so whether you are a red fish or a minnow you could always use an extra few cents. There are other benefits than just that and the other benefits are the community thatdoesn't require registration.


@qurator

Qrator is a bot that will upvote 1 post of a registered author every day at between 0.06SBD and 0.98SBD with a registration fee of 2SBD (meaning a T0 user would require about 34 posts in order to make their registration fee back) but by simple upvoting their posts yo can increase your tier. Qurator also comes with an exclusive upvote bot where you pay 1SBD and get an upvote on a post. The bot requires no work other than requesting to see if your account is posting material that stands up to their standard and if so then you can easily join. So the goal of qurator is to offer more benefits to unique content on steemit.


Advertising

With all this talk of bots I decided to talk about a bot that I am working on, just in case there is anyone that doesn't know about it yet. @steemstem-bot is a specialized trailing bot that will trail behind @steemstem and will upvote content (free of charge) at around 0.01SBD. The goal is to have the bot build up enough SP so that it can make a difference and eventually upvote greater than 0.01SBD. Once an accurate model is present on the number of average upvotes being given each day by steemstem it will calculate the minimum delegation required and then it will trail behind. The goal/plan of the bot may change in the future.


For a more indepth (older) post, go here



FYI

I am using each of these bots to upvote my post, then I am going to value each upvote I get and write a second post (after payout) about the return on investment from the bots. Some of the bots I overpaid (for rep) which is fine by me. I will make a second post that will state the amount made versus the amount spent to give people an idea for which bots they want for rep and which are for profit.


Kryzsec's Steemit Board


Sort:  

Thanks for all the info here. I didn't know about some of these bots. I find steemlike the most interesting to me, I will give it a try.

I am glad you enjoyed it. I would upvote you for more (more than 0.01SBD value) but you upvoted to 0.5... don't feel discouraged if it takes a while as I believe there is manual monitoring of posts to make certain they aren't... spam or anything like that.

Hey kryzsec, grate article!
The link to the second bot (@steemlike) is broken. Just a little hint.

Thank you for pointing that out, I believe I have fixed it. Either way, I wish I could upvote your comment higher!

gladly done :)

I see some of these bots have upvoted this post.
My question is what is the etiquette or accepted practice on using MULTIPLE bots. Are folks OK with this practice? If not what's the alternative?
Thanks for a very informative post.

The bots have upvoted this post as there will be a second post where I break down how much I spent on each bot versus how much I made in return. I could have done the math and used the vote value formula but I though experimental evidence would be better.

So are folks generally OK with an author using multiple bots to try and get some traction on Steemit?

Some are, some aren't. I think as long as the post has quality content then it is okay and since more and more of the bots are cracking down on bad content, its... well. its getting better.

Don't forget about us!

If you looking to get more visibility at steemit, please give a try for our upvote service @litasio.

upvote-litasio.jpg

Best wishes, @litasio

At 100% VP your upvote is worth ~0.0010823420758553SBD meaning your maximum upvote is worth the same as the minimum bid. I will check again in a couple of days but your service should at minimum be able to net positive on minim payment including the amount taken from curation (i.e. 0.00133 or greater SBD value vote)

I would suggest getting some delegators

We are on they way to get more SP. It will take some time.

Thank you for letting us know @kryzsec .This will definitely help. Resteemed.

Thanks, I hope the information helps someone.

Thanks for the info. It's really helpful

"With great power comes great responsibility!"

Thank you for this @kryzsec. Will try the @steemlike today.

Don't be discouraged if it takes a while (it isn't instant like others) as I believe they manually look at each post first to ensure it isn't.... bad.

Already received it my upvote. I was expecting some delays but yes, it was worth it. Will use @steemlike from now on. Thank you.

No problem, I am glad you enjoyed it!

Hello. You can add @boostme to this list :)

I haven't looked too much into @boostme and was more looking at doing an experiment on steemit. I will look into boostme and append it a little bit!

bu bilgilendirme yazın gerçekten hoşuma gitti. kaydediyorum daha detaylı okumak için. teşekkürler arkadaşım

excellent info and post. congrats my friend and thanks for sharing

Thanks for translating!

The @OriginalWorks bot has determined this post by @kryzsec to be original material and upvoted it!

ezgif.com-resize.gif

To call @OriginalWorks, simply reply to any post with @originalworks or !originalworks in your message!

Qurator
Your Quality Content Curator
This post has been upvoted and given the stamp of authenticity by @qurator. To join the quality content creators and receive daily upvotes click here for more info.

Qurator's exclusive support bot is now live. For more info click HERE or send some SBD and your link to @qustodian to get even more support.

Congratulations! This post has been upvoted from the communal account, @minnowsupport, by opticcncfan from the Minnow Support Project. It's a witness project run by aggroed, ausbitbank, teamsteem, theprophet0, someguy123, neoxian, followbtcnews/crimsonclad, and netuoso. The goal is to help Steemit grow by supporting Minnows and creating a social network. Please find us in the Peace, Abundance, and Liberty Network (PALnet) Discord Channel. It's a completely public and open space to all members of the Steemit community who voluntarily choose to be there.

If you would like to delegate to the Minnow Support Project you can do so by clicking on the following links: 50SP, 100SP, 250SP, 500SP, 1000SP, 5000SP. Be sure to leave at least 50SP undelegated on your account.

Very valuable and useful news.thanks.

good post

This post has received a 94.60% upvote from @lovejuice thanks to @kryzsec. They love you, so does Aggroed. Please be sure to vote for Witnesses at https://steemit.com/~witnesses.

This post has received a 25.05 % upvote from @booster thanks to: @kryzsec.

Bagus saya suka

This post has received a 50.00 % upvote from @boostme thanks to @kryzsec.

Thank you @kryzsec for this very informative post for a newbie like me. I definitely upvote, resteem and follow you! Cheers

booster and steemfunding provided a little over half of the total value of this post (~40SBD) so if you want to earn more money, they have the potential to help.

Thanks for sharing this super rich info. It saved me lots of work man. God bless and increase your wisdom. I get to understand the bots stuff and how they work now. Well done

Is this post still up to date?

thank you for the useful info

Thank you so much...

This was an informative post but there is one thing I would comment on re: randowhale. I think the info provided is lacking certain info..For example, there is something "wrong"- or at least unfairly unbalanced on a supposedly decentralized platform - when the owner of a bot service (berniesadners) uses the SP power of bots in large #s to CENTRALIZE votes..i.e., intentionally harass and downvote the most popular posts into invisibility, thus reducing their rewards ...while at the same time upvoting themselves into trending... so it appears as if "the crowd" is objecting to the targeted blog...Also at the same time, I have noticed this pack of bots -there are many that seem to be associated bots of berniesandrs- use the same language to intimidate-Best example is accusing consistently popular/trending bloggers of "RAPING THE REWARD POOL", and using terms like "SHAME" in all CAPS- Pretty unique and offensive scare tactic that they all use... Its a little NAZI/mafia style intimidation and propaganda.. and it is happening on Steem, on the EXCELLENT blog of @haejin. This (@haejins) blog provides free technical analysis and free classes on cryptocurrencies, assisting his followers to earn LOTS of $$ while learning the Elliott wave techniques...
So I will say that perhaps the above post is just a little misleading (because it leaves out the very damaging way in which this bot service is used) , and that if this centralizing behavior is allowed on a decentralized platform then it is no longer decentralized...

decentralized just means that it doesn't exist on a single server owned by a single person thus meaning that steemit is still decentralized. Actually more correctly it means that it doesn't have a single server that supplies all the supply all the other servers with info (i.e. centralized server) Like DNS servers are decentralized because pretty much anyone can start one up but that doesn't mean it also doesn't have aspects of centralization. For instance, each DNS server that is withing 300 km of me (220 miles I think, not actually converting) is owned by a single company but its still considered decentralized.

Now @berniesanders does with his voting share as he wishes but considering there are also witnesses (not certain if you even know what a witness is since you don't know what decentralized is) that are coming forward about @haejin (@themarkymark to name one) about him taking between 6-8% of the weekly reward pool. Oh yeah, and that around 80-90% of his profit (from the last 22 days now I think it is) has come from a single user.

As for your remark on the posts being "EXCELLENT" well @haejin basically predicts everything will go up in value (something my brother in law, that didn't even know there were other cryptos than bitcoin until a couple nights ago, could tell you) and is basically the same crap repeated over and over again. It offers absolutely nothing to the steemit community. Do I agree with everything the sanders bot army does? No, but all the fuss being brought over him going after a single user (with support from witnesses whom initially though it was a bug in the system saying he was earning so much but nope he actually was) really makes me support this crusade. Anyways as flagging says "Disagreement on reward" for the top reasons and him (and many others) to downvote means that they are doing nothing wrong. So please, for future posting, learn what decentralized means (as it isn't what you think it means) and don't upvote your comment to the top.

You are a member of his sockpuppet army so what are you talking about? Sorry but I am on to you. Being a witness does not mean you are not in on the scheme, as Markymark actually gave himself away already (and so did you, whoops!). You all give yourselves away, although some are more slick than others.

I know what decentralized means, and when some entity takes over a decentralized system, guess what, thats centralized.

Why did you flag my post, was it inappropriate?

Do you even know what Elliott Wave technical analysis is? It takes years of study, and @haejin is making a lot of $$ for his followers. You are only concerned with the fact that he is cutting into your massive share of the reward pool through the scheme that Bernie/you and friends are running. So obvious its nauseating.

I flagged it from $1.26 down to lower it in the comments. As for being a part of bernies army? That is a very ad hominem.

No a decentralized entity cannot become centralized by a single entity taking over a certain portion of the system, centralized means that it has a central point that supplies the rest. Facebook has a central server that supplies the rest of its servers around the world with the information required, steemit is served from multiple (50 servers and for the exact number of nodes you would need to talk to a witness as that changes) meaning it can't be centralized. Anyways main reason for flagging was disagreement on reward.

Personally I do not give two flying fucks what @haejin is making on steemit, because I am not here for money (unlike some) and instead I am here for the same reason why I am on reddit, its fun to be a part of a community of similar minded people and to meet people all over the world. But continue with your arguments accusing me of being a bernie puppet, it just makes me laugh

Glad I made you laugh, you made my day! No its not ad hominem, I have seen you on downvote lists of Bernies which were completely attacking the blog simply for being popular enough to keep making it into trending, (with the accusation of raping the reward pool)- thats what this is all about. And why do you try and deny that you are attempting to make money? Why else would someone be a part of a bot network? Why else do you pay for upvotes? Please, correct me.

There absolutely is centralization of the reward pool taking place...Ok your turn, go ahead and ramble away with a condescending explanation of why you are right. Why dont you flag me while you are at it?

I pay for bots to upvote this post to do a second post that analyzes the ROI for people. For other posts, I will do it because then I can help others out more and increase my say in a vote of something. And yes it is ad hominem, you completely disregard things because you think I am some puppet or bot of berniesanders. As for my flags? I flag posts that I disagree with the rewards on, spam, or comments that add no value and are upvoted super high by someone with no reason to upvote.

If I were attempting to make money then I would either be HODLing or (more likely) I would be liquidating SBD into something more versatile (ETH, BTC, etc) that I could go to an exchange with and cash out. As well, a bernie bot wouldn't have to pay for a 25% upvote from radowhale

All I can say to the ad hominem business is that when I see you downvoting @haejin, and then stating it is because his content doesn't deserve the rewards it gets, thus supporting it getting downvoted to invisible status...
There is a huge demand by crypto investors for bloggers who do accurate technical analysis, because it gives them a little edge in the shitstorm of coins out there- Not only does @haejin fit the bill because he is making them huge returns on their investments- but it is also FREE for them to get the advice, and performed by a seasoned professional who teaches them how to do the Elliott wave analysis for themselves. There are people who spend $$thousands for courses on this and get half the content. His accuracy rate is higher than most paid TA services. He has earned overwhelming appreciation for the gift he provides.

You (and others of like mindset of "hey there is a parade we know nothing about- lets shit on it!", rather than providing anything of value ) came to his blog soley because you dont agree with him getting the rewards that he gets. These are the only people who downvote him, not his actual followers. It reminds me of bussing strangers in to vote or stir up trouble. Its interference- driven by either greed, jealousy, or some other negative emotion. So if you are not in any way associated with the Bsanders entity (I doubt it simply based on a 5/5 rating for randowhale, lol- give me a break) then maybe you should consider not thinking or acting like him either.

Anyway, better to cultivate positive emotions.

 7 years ago  Reveal Comment

I figured you guys knew already!