Since you're using a legal argument, would you care to highlight what specific statement is slanderous?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Since you're using a legal argument, would you care to highlight what specific statement is slanderous?
Gladly
By putting that in the title, it is presuming she is doing some nefarious steem farming with fake accounts, similar to someone Walden correctly pointed out dollarconception, who obviously did have a fke comment bot farm, but ii feel like he is conflating that case with sweetsssj, she does not need any fake comments, look at her comments they are real, if she gets bots that is not her fault we all get bots from time to time, she wouldnt waste her time with something like that
we all know she is succesful nd dosnt need any fake accounts OR the need to cheat, she makes ENOUGH money she does NOT have ANY incentive to do any sort of "cheating" like walden is obviously implying
This is not a legal court its social media and I dont have to explain myself when I state the fact that Walden is the one here Implying Sweetsssj is doing something wrong
See that little thing at the end of the title? It's called a question mark. It indicates that the previous statement is a question.
Source: wikipedia
On the other hand ...
Source: wikipedia
My point is: an interrogative clause is not a claim. Therefore, it cannot be slanderous.
This is social media not the court room and walden knew exactly w hat he was doing whe he made a CLAIM that she is running a 13 account content farm, it implies nefarious activities, thats all, im not arguing against your facts, im just talking about reality here on social media and the many social metrics that we cannot measure yet unfortunately , there were many REAL abuses walden could have reported on but he chose to attack one of the most popular steeians who is also very succesful in a very jelous move, its about the space in betwe the notes, look at how he just all of the sudden goes from posting youtube links of songs that arent his, reposting lame psts, to just this attack on sweetsssj, as if he is some steemit expert in abuse, which he is not, he does not contribute to the steemian society, he is just gasping for attention falsifying this story making all these assumptions and its just full of logical fallacies, he is implying that she is stealing from the reward pool somehow which you remind us is an invalid concept
Look at the comments, this post has lead many to believe she IS doing something wrong... you see how its slanderish? is that better? hah i agree it was incorrect use of teh word
but can it be slanderish? How about libel can throw t hat one out?