You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Is Wildspark the Steemit Killer? @BlockRush

in #steemit7 years ago (edited)

Interesting. But a Steemit Killer?


A different concept all together. With view of investment, advertising, reward distribution and content creation.

Instead of laboring every point, as some have been addressed in other comments, these thoughts are about content.

The principle of link sharing. Does Wild Park see itself as an aggregator or existing content on different platforms rather than a original content creator?

Is it not likely that this concept will attract all those people who are merely copy/pasting other people's content to make a quick buck?

Content Content Content


Steemit's emphasis is on original content creation in any genre imaginable.
Wild Park, with its link affiliation, invites to share Other People's content, rather than creating original work. How does this par with copyright laws?

I don't see Wild Park as a competitor but as a complimentary external platform. Why not promote one's own content elsewhere?

One last thought. I am reluctant to use or promote main stream platforms such as FB, YT, Twitter etc. These monopolies have become politicised beyond value-add.


Thanks for reading. 😎

globocop_small_orginalcontent.png
ch @globocop

[Upvote] [Comment] [Resteem] [Follow]

Sort:  

Good thinking @robocop!

however do not miss the fact that everyone could be a content creator on Wild Spark - no one is restricted to only promoting content.

Oh yes, agreed. My point is that non-original content creators will be drawn to the platform in swarms, while Steemit frowns upon copy/paste or no value-add link submissions.

I think Wild-Park may well co-exist nicely with Steemit.

Oh, it's globocop - not robocop. Not so much into transhumanism... 🤖

ch @globocop

haha @globocop, well noted!

That's WildSpark.

Wild-park is the sub-network of NSFW content ;)