I've upvoted and followed you because this is a vital issue going forward and will define the evolution and survival of our species no doubt.
However, I got the feeling from this short video that it was "lazy journalism"... sensationalism... that the interviewees didn't really understand or appreciate just what they were upvoting. The first girl in particular, imo, seemed to understand the question as a world where we all come together as a species and global community in better understanding and love. I don't think she got "New World Order" at all.
Even in this day and age, NWO is still a meaningless term for many people n the mainstream. They don't get what you are talking about, nor the possible implications, without laying out your case and side of the discussion/argument first. This journalist didn't do that.
I'm an educator. I don't ask students their opinion on things they are not informed on without first presenting the evidence. Otherwise, "New World Order" may as well be the favorite horse running in the 3.30 race this afternoon.
Q. Would you back "New World Order"?
A. Sure dude , what odds am I getting?
Yeah, lots of work to do... so why did you let these uninformed citizens walk off without doing it?