I have been proving Illuminati was real for my entire career as an alternative media journalist and Truther. Many people today are skeptical of the Illuminati conspiracy and few know what it actually is. At least so much as being able to articulate any ideas other than the ones propagated by popular culture .

Through my minds eye there were tons of random facts, and scattered information that I had consolidated over the years, things that I had long established (in my own mind to be true), I rattled off all the sources I could remember, but the reality of which was that the two most prominent examples I could remember finding on my path to understanding this issue were simply YouTube video's. It was not the platform but rather the sources of the material that had originally made such a strong first impression. the first being Manly P. Halls recording from a 1967 lecture on occult secret societies where he explicitly mentions both the Rothschild family and Jewish Zionism. It is only important to distinguish Jewish Zionism forward because there are other forms of Zionism, Rastafarians, Muslims, and Later day saints all have a version of Zion in their beliefs, and while the history of the ideal of Zionism, the mythological return to paradise is rich and constitutes a study in itself, this essay will focus directly on Rothschild Zionism and attempt to validate the existence of, and cast light on an International Zionist conspiracy which has been created and maintained by the Rothschild family. While I will attempt to the best of my ability to establish this as fact by using documented material and highest quality first hand sources, to the extent which such a broad conspiracy can be covered in a single article. That being said from this point this article will be framed as a response to a recent comment from my friend John Liberty who on facebook said;

"From what I've been able to find thus far, It does not appear that they own large chunks of the Federal Reserve or other central banks, Rothschild bank as it currently stands is not a major banking power player any more than other large banks. They did not fund both sides of wars, the whole 'they bought the bank of England after the Napoleonic wars' Is complete conjecture that comes from that pamphlet I linked above, Their funding of 'communism' wasn't direct, it was however a support for Bolshevism. I have yet to find any first hand evidence proving they instigated WW1. I have also yet to find any first hand account proving they financed the league of nations any more than other global institutions. They also do not own the media any more than any other global banking institutions. To wrap this, what I have found, is that the Rothschild's image has been artificially inflated to demonize them and thus further a cause of antisemitism, that regained popularity in Europe during the mid 19th century. I strongly encourage you to dig deeper, find firsthand sources and actual documentation [and later] "I have a high standard of proof and have been fooled by this in the past, so I will not assert anything I can not back with[out] documented evidence. If someone is tied to a family, I expect documented first hand proof." [such as] birth certificates, official notarized, or accredited documents (links to PDFs are fine) peer reviewed and accredited literature, statements of ownership, basically what we call hard evidence.

This got me thinking "what proof do I really have" ? For lack of time and space I cannot possibly start from the beginning, but I will focus on addressing the above comments and providing source material in response to each sentence in the comment above.

("From what I've been able to find thus far, It does not appear that they own large chunks of the Federal Reserve or other central banks, Rothschild bank as it currently stands is not a major banking power player any more than other large banks.)

THE FACTS ARE

In 1976 five charts were created, published, and introduced into US congressional record. While it could be said that politicians are historically not trust worthy the charts from report titled [Federal Reserve Directors: A Study of Corporate and Banking Influence] (https://archive.org/details/FederalReserveDirectorsAStudyOfCorporateAndBankingInfluence) do give an excellent visual overview as to who runs the financial system by controlling the privately owned banks that collectively own the FED.

Chart 1: reveals the linear relationship between the Rothschild banking family, the Bank of England, and the London banking houses which ultimately control the Federal Reserve Banks through their stock-holdings of bank stock and their subsidiary firms in New York. The two principal Rothschild representatives in New York, are J. P. Morgan Co., and Kuhn,Loeb & Co. who were the firms which set up the Jekyll Island Conference at which the Federal Reserve Act was drafted, who directed the subsequent successful campaign to have the plan enacted into law by Congress, and who purchased the controlling amounts of stock in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in 1914. These firms had their principal officers appointed to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Federal Advisory Council in 1914. In 1914 a few families (blood or business related) owning controlling stock in existing banks (such as in New York City) caused those banks to purchase controlling shares in the Federal Reserve regional banks. Examination of the charts and text in the House Banking Committee Staff Report of August, 1976 and the current stockholders list of the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks show this same family control. This is a congressional Document available in archive form at Archive.com and at the library in congress in Washington DC.

The federal reserve is was founded by owned by a few international banking institutions and families - the Rockefellers, the Morgans, the Warburgs, Rotshchild, Lazard Freres now (Eugene Meyer), Kuhn Loeb Company, and Goldman Sachs. Rothschild’s two main subordinates in the US were originally JP Morgan and Kuhn & Loeb. This is based on information and charts provided in the House Banking Committee Staff Report of August, 1976.

("They did not fund both sides of wars, the whole 'they bought the bank of England after the Napoleonic wars' Is complete conjecture..)

(source) Bavarian Illuminati Original Documents. 1785

On the 20th of July 1785 a courier of the Illuminati named Jacob Lance who worked as a local Priest was struck by lightning and died on the spot. He had a number of very interesting documents tucked away inside his robe at the time & with further investigation by the police found a treasure of documents inside his home. Some of these documents were directed to the Grand Master of the Grand Orient of Paris including a member list & detailed instructions for the coming French Revolution. All of the seized materials were handed over to the Bavarian government and lead to a ban on all Secret Societies on the 4th of August 1785. The Grand Duke of Bavarian ordered a number of the articles printed for the public to see justifying his ban, these were originally printed under the title; "Some Original Documents Of The Illuminati Order" and then even followed that up with a second publishing under the title; ["Supplement of Further Original Documents"] (http://libertygalaxy.com/ebooks/Nachtrag-Von-Weitern-Originalschriften-1-Correspondenz-1787.pdf) Links are photo copied PDF's in original German.

Although these were not really of interest to the public back then other people took every chance they could get to learn about the growing power structure that had been exposed. The documents while not originals but copies still exist in the Ingolstadt Archives today. Even documents of lesser importance that were published are still amazing as they lay out how to create and run Secret Societies from inside current Secret Societies. A great deal of the documents found where plans for a French Revolution remember this is in Germany, the birth place of both Mayer Amschel Rothschild, the German Jewish banker and the founder of the Rothschild banking dynasty, and the foundations of order of the Illuminati. To assume that Adam Weishaupt leader of a powerful and wealthy secret society was not in contact with the towns largest banker is outright naive. Connecting one of the most powerful banking families of all time to the most secretive society of the last 300 years is a scholarly pursuit worthy of collegiate funding. Although according to most historical accounts Weishaupt’s secret order grew considerably in size and diversity, possibly numbering 600 members by 1782, and that membership included the most important people in Bavarian public life, such as Baron Adolph von Knigge and the banker Mayer Amschel Rothschild, "who provided funding." Further the notion that one could prove that the Rothschild family funded both sides of the Napoleonic wars with a with a link or Pdf is honestly one of the most ignore-ant things I have ever read in my entire life, and completely and utterly disrespects the work multiple of scholars greater than I, who dedicated their lives to gathering that information and printing books that exposed the relationship. All wars are bankers wars, is a book and documentary which goes into great detail on this subject. When you research this online the top link you will find is a Business Insider article which references a Economy watch article which references The World's Richest Family - You Didn't Know About. The first sentence of the article reads; "The Rothschilds are the most famous banking family in history. In the 19th century they lent money to Kings and governments and funded both sides in the Napoleonic wars." and goes on to quote a left-wing English writer J.A Hobson, who wrote in his book Imperialism: A Study in 1902, “Does anyone seriously suppose that a great war could be undertaken by any European state, or a great state loan subscribed if the house of Rothschild and their connections set their face against it?” While not surprisingly there are no check's signed by a Rothschild directly to Napoleon Bonaparte, historians and authorities who specialize in the Napoleonic wars seem to be at an almost unanimous consensus on the issue. And there is a wealth of period literature on the subject. Lets see what some Local newspapers in New York, Paris, and London have to tell us about the subject:

“Appeal to Reason” newspaper from 1914, full pdf available at the Kansas Historical Society.

The New York Times published an article entitled: The Rothschild Family; The Greatest Financiers Of The Age on May 19, 1878;

Nathan Rothschild was particularly skilled, as he successfully benefited from the trick with Waterloo battle news, and put his hands on London. The same NYT article says:

FACT; All of the five Rothschild sons had a huge impact on the European politics. It is said they were responsible for almost all of the European wars from 19th and 20th centuries.

While artifacts relating to Rothschild funds traveling directly into the hands of Napoleon are hard to come by, in this case being that we are talking about second and third generation decedents of the foundering members of most powerful secret societies of the past millennium. Given the facts available, human nature, first and second hand accounts, and the consensus of today's authorities it is safe to assume they at least in part help financed the French revolution and parties on both sides of the Napoleonic wars. [And all subsequent wars]

Receipt from the Treasury for the repayment of the first instalment of the 'Suez' loan 9th March 1876.

Where the problem with understanding this begins as I will demonstrate forward, stems from skeptics often strategic use of language, and academic laziness. When you see meme or headlines that read "Rothschild's made fortunes cashing in by funding both sides of Napoleon's wars", that is an incorrect statement, in fact the Rothschild family broke even or took a loss on most of their investments into the war between France and Great Britain. This is most likely because the objective of the investments were not financially motivated they were politically motivated, again hundreds of books exist on the subject.

Where the Rothschild family did gain a lot of money was in the English stock market following the battle of Waterloo. Again we find very selective language used by skeptics in an attempt to distort or retain popular history. Namely the whole 'they bought the bank of England after the Napoleonic wars' Is complete conjecture. Yes it is, but because that is an untrue statement they didn't "buy England" that's absurd, they capitalized on a stock market crash, by investing into the English stock market after a rumor was started that the British had lost the battle of Waterloo and there was a massive sell which brought the prices of shares in English corporations down to mere fractions of their worth. All along the Rothschild family who had already established a Europe-wide network of messengers and carrier pigeon stations knew the rumor to be false. According to one popular legend in June of 1815 shortly after the battle ended, and long before anyone else knew who was the victor, Rothschild agents began selling off stocks, speculators of course naturally assumed Napoleon had won and Europe was lost, panic ensued and when prices crashed the Rothschilds bought everything they could, and made a gigantic unprecedented profit. How do we know this is true ? Because they brag about it themselves as this is a monumental moment in Rothschild family history. They framed the carrier pigeon letter it's available to view in the Rothschild's personal archives. Even though the original letter is composed of code language and they could of kept this information a secret they themselves chose to release a photocopy of the letter and the encryption keys publicly on their families personal archival website.

*A letter written in August 1846 by Nathaniel de Rothschild from Paris (Nathaniel was Nathan’s son) says: “I hope our feathered messengers will have brought you in due time our good prices” Elsewhere in the letter he reveals, “A B in our pigeon dispatches means: buy stock, the news is good; C D…means sell stock, the news is bad” Archive

Direct evidence proving 'they' instigated WW1.

For years i have been trying to figure out what one single piece of information I could somehow present to tackle the extremely intricate web of information pertaining to the Rothschild's involvement in the events that unfolded internationally between 1901-1919, I find it to be painfully disrespectful to the scores of academics who dedicated their whole lives to the study. I find it to be equally obnoxious to so effortlessly discredit their hard work, people like Webster Tarpley, Larry Abraham, and G. Edward Griffin, and to top it off with inconsistent and derogatory claims of antisemitism even though people like Henry Makow a Jewish Ph.D. and Jewish historian, Howard Sachar author of the book above came to same conclusion. Honesty again I'm inclined to demonstrate the naivety of a skeptic attitude on this issue, there is no one piece of first hand evidence there are thousand upon thousands of pieces of evidence, letters, journals, newspaper articles, transcripts, documented financial transactions, congressional and archival records, piles of books, lectures, and even a feature length film. I find it insane that people can rationally presume that the most powerful family on the planet at the time, who owned the major banks and lending institutions in England, France, Austria and Germany played no roll in instigating the war that would consolidate their global influence, eliminate their largest competition (the Romanov dynasty,) and give them the international property rights to create the state of Israel, the Jewish homeland their family had been longing for, for generations prior. The later part of this is well documented again on their own archive site, and codified by the Balfour Declaration.

FIRST WORLD WAR FACTS

Lionel Nathan de Rothschild established a recruiting office at New Court three months before a War Office Circular of 18th December 1915 formally noted the establishment of a Central Jewish Recruiting Committee with Edmund Sebag-Montefiore as Chairman and Lionel as Vice-chairman. The Committee’s purpose was to encourage the recruitment of Jews into the armed services.

Chaim Weizmann centre in white with Captain James de Rothschild.

A copy of Lord Rothschild's initial draft declaration, to offer Jewish Zionist and Rothschild Family support to Britain in exchange for a section of British mandated Palestine, July 1917, from the British War Cabinet archives.

UK Government Cabinet Papers Secret Cabinet Paper CP 60 (23), 'Palestine and the Balfour Declaration, January 1923. First published Nevill Barbour, Odyssey Press, 1947, page 73 Palestine and the Balfour Declaration, Cabinet Paper, January 1923. Click Here to Enlarge and See Entire Document.

NEXT ARTICLE

The origins of political Zionism through the Rothschild family. +
First hand accounts of how "they"financed the league of nations and many more global institutions.

PART 2 of 5