You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Some times grown ups fight - and then later they forgive each other and move forward.

in #steemit • 9 years ago

Tuck to ignore the "enemy"? No no no no.... He is on a "holy crusade" now!

He starts by attacking people using the "it's funny" excuse and then with his comments and actions he admits that he is actually on a vendetta, hypocrisy at it's finest! He has gone so retard that now he downvotes old irrelevant blogs as some kind of "revenge" to those that disagree with him and flag his nonsense childish behavior. It was not long ago when he attacked another user here just because he expressed his diferent opinion in his vlog.

Good luck to anyone that tries to reason with him...

9 years ago in #steemit by
$0.00
    Reply 9
    Sort:  
  • Trending
    • Loading...
    [-]
     9 years ago  
    I don't have time or I'm in the mood to educate you dude, I don't know what your agenda is and you are behaving like this but good luck pursuing it, you will need it. My time to reason with you is over.

    I responded to you with valid information concerning the definition of a word you used improperly. Why does that make you upset?

    Anyway, good news for all of us ... my agenda has apparently been accomplished!

    What most of you are apparently unaware of is that Developers will usually not move a muscle to implement a feature when only a few people are complaining. But if you can create mass disruption among the entire user base ... well, those Developers now have a problem and they will move quickly to combat the issue.

    And it only took only 72 hours of psychological warfare to piss you all off until you were complaining relentlessly and force that sociopath to request the block feature women have begged to have implemented for months ... yet the Dev's did nothing.

    The good news is, I hear through the grapevine that Dan may actually be finally considering it or may have already begun work, but I've yet to confirm the information that was passed my way.

    I hope @dan or @ned will confirm it here or anywhere. If that information was incorrect, well that is unfortunate and will truly show that this Dev team does not value users safety on this platform (that's me, forcing their hand again). ;)

    If that information is true, it's funny that it took a giant man whining about harassment, because someone pointed out his abuse, to get the Dev's to move on this topic. Nevertheless, it sounds like success from the information I've been told!

    Hopefully soon no one will ever have to put up with death threats, d0xing, intimidation, rape threats, flag wars or verbal abuse from fyrstikken or any other sociopath on Steemit in the future.

    "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke

    [-]
     9 years ago  
    So, you started harrasing people, posting pictures of dicks all over the place and abusing the flag system in order to "protect the women"?

    That's a bot posting those pictures. I don't run the bot.

    I only flagged back the fyrstikker clan that was (well you continue to no matter what) flagging my comments simply because you apparently don't like me pointing out abusers and you support people who make death threats and curse out women. Which says a lot about you and the others.

    I still don't understand why you're so angry. But I do understand why angry people like you support people who make death threats and verbally abuse women.

    $0.21
    • Past Payouts $0.21
    • - Author $0.21
    • - Curators $0.00
    1 vote
    Reply
    [-]
     9 years ago (edited) 

    So, you started harrasing people, posting pictures of dicks all over the place and abusing the flag system in order to "protect the women"?

    How nice of you!

    Someone else might get some better(more hardcore) ideas though! this time in order to "protect the childreen" from "nice" guys like you!

    [-]
     9 years ago  

    @cryspano you have to let it go, because this 'women protector' doesn't know what is doing. He just repeating few words like 'sociopath' and 'harassing'. I replied to his comments and still, I'm the one who must stop and I'm the one who is harassing him! He is lost in those two words and he can't find the way out. I know a short cut for him ' Stop saying nonsense words and move on, lulz!

    $0.00
      Reply
      [-]
       9 years ago  
      Telling a Greek that he doesn't know what 'hypocrisy' means, you are funny as tuck!

      hy·poc·ri·sy
      noun
      the behavior of people who do things that they tell other people not to do : behavior that does not agree with what someone claims to believe or feel.

      He starts by attacking people using the "it's funny" excuse and then with his comments and actions he admits that he is actually on a vendetta

      http://www.tritebuttrue.com/blog/archives/2006/01/what_exactly_is.html

      These days, however, most people casually use the word in the fifth sense to denote anyone whose behavior is inconsistent with some remark he has made or some position he is alleged to hold. This usage does not suggest insincerity or deceit as much as it does either a lack of logic or the inability to live up to one's professed ideals.

      I think calling people hypocrites in this sense is often tantamount to calling them human. Everyone of us is a hypocrite by the standard of perfect consistency. Virtually everyone makes New Year's resolutions he doesn't keep. Everyone makes little compromises he would prefer not to make. Everyone changes his mind at times and decides to reject as false or inadequate what he previously might have thought or said.

      Ralph Waldo Emerson, in his essay "Self Reliance," went so far as to say that "a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds." Inconsistency at times may be simple honesty—a recognition that the general rule does not always apply. It may also be a sign of intellectual honesty, humility, and maturity.

      We are not hypocrites every time we are inconsistent. We are hypocrites in the truest sense of the word when we are deliberately devious and manipulative, when we say what we actually do not believe in order to impress, deceive, or exploit others. To use this word of strong accusation correctly ought to require a clear proof of the culprit's intent.

      I believe we could improve civil discourse if we all stop calling people hypocrites unless we have indisputable evidence of their imposture. Yes, there are real hypocrites in the world, but we destroy the power and usefulness of the word by using it--all too frequently--to denote mere inconsistency.

      I maintain that it was pretty damn funny and nearly 200 people agreed. So show me where is the hypocrisy? Using humor to make a point or bring someones actions to the forefront is not hypocrisy. Nor did anyone do something they were telling another they could not do.

      [-]
       9 years ago  

      I don't have time or I'm in the mood to educate you dude, I don't know what your agenda is and you are behaving like this but good luck pursuing it, you will need it. My time to reason with you is over.

      $0.00
        Reply
        [-]
         9 years ago  

        Well from looking at his sources and seeing how fyrst responded to @heiditravels, I can see he can be funny and also a hothead. Can't say he doesn't bring some value too. As for the sources Tuck brings up here...it is hard for me to dispute that Fyrst could probably benefit from kicking it down a notch.

        But I have this weird feeling these two accounts are going to be battling regardless of what I say and likely don't care too much about my thoughts on the matter between them.

        These two are meant to fight eachother----throughout eternity. At least both are over 9000...

        $0.00
          Reply