Seems that you've missed the "voting window" by about 20 minutes. I'm sorry, but I can not control the fact, that lots of people want to use @tipU service at the same time.
I can not limit the demand, I can only adjust the supply but in the same time I don't want users to loose money on @tipU service (like it's happening now on many bidding bots).
But, is this sustainable? This is a global business, people live in different time-zones... 20' seems a very narrow window to channelise the demand... as well I noted that, sometimes you refund part of the bid because you cannot upvote with your announced 200% return...
What would be your "perfect point of performance", I mean delegated SP, vs. sustainable vote? Did you think about?
Well, the last voting session lasted 20 minutes because a lot of people wanted to use @tipU service at the same time and the amount of available votes was quickly used - I have little control over this :) With STEEM price going up and more delegations it should be better.
The main reason for refund is that @tipu will spend more voting power on new and interesting posts.
Can you rephrase the question please?
i want to delegate 433.932 sp to @tipu
Hi @improv! Special squad of highly trained hamsters prepared this delegation link for you:
steemconnect: 433.932 SP delegation for @tipu.