There's lots of problems with this analysis, but let's start with just outright wrong info: only developer from Steemit that left with Dan was himself....
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
There's lots of problems with this analysis, but let's start with just outright wrong info: only developer from Steemit that left with Dan was himself....
So if there is a lot wrong with the analysis, one way to fix that is communication.
Provide feedback, not to me, put to the entire site, on what the correct information and data is.
Or continue on current path with current communication approaches y the STEEM team, and watch STEEM sink away.
I can't make STEEM team communicate better.
But the market will vote on the quality of the communication and the market's belief in vision and execution with STEEM price.
Voting happens every day.
I won't be rude by posting the results of the voting over the last 6 months. You know what those votes aer saying as well as I do.
I can't make Steem team communicate any better either, unfortunately. It is a weakness, I agree. I only popped in here to correct what I considered a serious error in your post. Phrasing a complete guess as a "Isn't it true" isn't great communication either, IMO.
I ended with "maybe I'm missing something, please let me know". I was clearly searching for any source of valid information.
You provided some. Thanks for the morsel.
Unfortunately that doesn't begin to form the bread crumb trail that would incent folks to keep a lot of money on the platform, in my opinion.