I encourage you to pull data on my flagging rather than making ridiculous assumptions based on the bullshit you hear from others. Until you pull REAL data about my flagging (it's all in the blockchain, right?), including how many account I have taken down to 0 rep or below, I will not entertain any more of your questions. When you have such data, feel free to post it and then we can have a conversation.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
This is an excellent response-- to an assumption I did not make.
I was clearly objective and stated that I don't know whether you have done this or not, so what ridiculous assumptions do you refer to?
The irony in this, is that you are making an assumption that I made an assumption. I now wonder if you even read anything I wrote.
Anything? Yes. Everything? No, I generally avoid rants...
Have fun, if you want to have a conversation I'm on steemit.chat. This BS exchange is a waste of my time.
It was not a rant, and there was no anger at all portrayed in the post. If you had read this, you would know that.
I'm going to sleep but, perhaps at some point tomorrow I will.
I'm now going to upvote this with all of my accounts because of the flagging. Feel free to criticize that one as well.
Why are you being an arsehole?
I can attest to the immaturity of setting up bots to auto-downvote a post or a comment without viewing the content, but it is your actions that have led to this happening, not mine.
The image I shared on @dantheman's post shows you upvoting a post--sorry, three posts--to $8 to counteract(apparently) a single minnows downvote? I spoke only on this observation, with good cause. And I also, in this post, said I'm willing to forget about that, but you seem to want to bring it up once again.
I see no reason for you be taking this hostile attitude with me when I am making the effort to start again and see you for who you are, not for who they say you are.
This is hardly doing a good job of convincing me that what I heard was wrong.