Fair enough. I believe I've seen enough to be concerned. It took a couple of months to build and launch steem and Steemit, a year to get to this. Advantages are hard enough to come by.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Fair enough. I believe I've seen enough to be concerned. It took a couple of months to build and launch steem and Steemit, a year to get to this. Advantages are hard enough to come by.
That's my point wrt EOS. Claims are great, reality is hard. Bold claims require vetting and proof, not credulity.
This is why Steem is one of the most impressive blockchain projects because it is being used today by people and it works. It's not theoretical, it's not a pre-release project that is having an ICO designed to raise an insane amount of money (and be gamed by the ICO issuer itself (they can reinvest ICO proceeds into the ICO and manipulate the price up and down...sigh, never play a game designed by someone who is better at games than you are)), it's something which women and men are using today to connect on and write on and Steem on.
I love Steem and Steemit and what is growing as a result. I couldn't be in more agreement concerning evidence and effectiveness. I accept completely that until EOS is proven, we should keep working and making the Steem magic happen. But, given the resource available today and the possibility (backed by Steem and bitshares) that EOS is a big step forward...it might be worth so planning and preparation. Steem and Steemians are unimaginably precious after all.