Well, having a smaller image size in terms of width and height, like 800x480 for example, essentially does result in not having a large in terms of file size image, so that should not be a problem. If publishing photos and you want to have a higher- resolution version, you just link the smaller image to a high-res version, so that when it is clicked om it will open the larger version in a new window.
Didn't understand your question... I'm talking exactly about the size of the photo (in terms of resolution), or are you referring to size as in KB?
Right yes, my bad i did mean what size in KB
Well, having a smaller image size in terms of width and height, like 800x480 for example, essentially does result in not having a large in terms of file size image, so that should not be a problem. If publishing photos and you want to have a higher- resolution version, you just link the smaller image to a high-res version, so that when it is clicked om it will open the larger version in a new window.
Awesome thanks for the advice
To optimize the loading of your images on the web try to keep them under 600 ko and all will be fine.