Just can't see how he justifies working with, or at least ignoring, the bigger problem. If his story is true(and I have to admit to never trying to find out) then why is he not just as angry at the known paedophiles who stand in office today? It makes no sense and when that is the case, it is usually because someone is lying. I just don't trust anything that is allowed this much exposure, it goes against the grain and wouldn't be allowed unless it serves a higher purpose. I suppose he could just misguided, but he doesn't sound that dumb.