Hehe, no problem. I need to make another witness update soon.
Indeed, it's pretty hard to claim something is original. Cheetah might only catch 70% of copy/paste, but has a 99.8% accuracy when she does leave a comment. It's a trade off, I could have programmed her for the reverse (catch 99% of copy paste, but only with 70% accuracy -- thus many false positives) but the design was to have high accuracy rather than high catch rate.
But either way you do it, it's not going to be perfect, so it's wrong to claim so. Hence, cheetah's comment is quite simple and relaxed, to hopefully not leave a bad impression on the 0.2% she makes a mistake on.
I think it's better how you programmed it - to have a lower catch rate with higher accuracy. Gives it more authority.
There is no reason to copy from someone else,
Be original and let us see you in posts
And not to see anyone else, who loves you wants to see you.
Your progress may be slower - but it will be of high quality.
I agree, and I've seen the people who are the false positives have pleasant short responses to cheetah. Hopefully anyone reading the thread will easily see why cheetah marked it as a false positive and know.
May I ask what the costs are? Are we talking electricity costs to run the machine that runs the bot or labor/development costs to constantly update it? Or... something else because I don't know a ton about what makes magic computer things cost money...?