An advise to @randowhale ....just set all votes at 2.5% and no more special bonus of 25% and 50%,it will be absolutely fair for all....if u keep having complaints from people and they are dissatisfied,u will still have customers but a competitor is on his way which might take away most of your customers...
GIVE THE BEST
BE THE BEST and u will
GET THE BEST
good luck randowhale...hope u consider this....if u wish to play votes at random u can use a closer and more fairly voting range of around 2.5%-3% ..dont turn your service into BETTING
I remain my humble self @amec
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
That is not sustainable.
Or rando...
People are going to complain no matter what you do. I think it's cool that you have a chance at a higher vote. That chance makes it worth it to me.
I have seens loads of blogs recently about trying to get a 25% vote! Has anybody even got this or was it for more sales SBD in thr bank. Rando is double profiting, all the curation,all the auther, and Free SBD in the bank from thr free votes he gets every day! Its a real good buisiness but agreed I use less and less now due to the higher probability if not even breaking even with SBD.
Yes, I had a 25% upvote lately, which was about $10. And only once I got a upvote worth less than what I paid.
I once got 25% vote worth approximately $10. and once I got 10% vote
Thats good! Wish i was in that boat. 👏👍
Yeah I got one too. Took 20 trys, but I got one.
Maybe one day then for me!
The reason why people complain is because randowhale is dynamic and change rules frequently probably in a bid to satisfy everyone but things dont work that way....i see all these bonus as a wasted effort...he should just have a unique and generous service that is fair for everyone
Then it's not rando...
A name doesnt define what a man is or what he does
It usually does if it's one's adopted moniker...
Then try something more unique like a standard of 2%....u dont lose,and everyone is satisfied,how do u think a client would feel if they paid for 5 boosts and got 1% upvote from all...in a radical point if view,u might see that as a normal occurrence and a possible outcome but from a honest point of view,it looks exploitative and rather sad to the user as he makes great loss....if i understand ur motive clearly,u intend on helping minnows get their posts noticed at a very considerable price,thank u 4 dat but do u really think its a good thing if u play a game that tends to make minnows lose their money?
If u play games with ur clients (minnows) where only ur clients tend to lose...i dont think that is really fair enough
I am not complaining about ur service or judging you based on ur actions,am only making u see the reason why some minnows complain about you service...i really hope you do something that favours everyone...together we can make steemit more better.. @amec
Wow upvote from 25% or 50% is genial get a so.