As a leader in this organisation, your responsibilities are bigger than you are giving them credit for. If that is your response, then you are both wrong! I wrote a message to you in steemit.chat - why do we not work together? It seems that we have to be at war - I don't want war - I want a future for the whole platform - Q1. There is no advantage in multiple accounts under my proposal - explain why you think there is - voting? If you are found to have multiple accounts without just cause and permission, you forfeit-simple. Whilst on the subject, why do you let noganoo have 200 accounts whilst mere mortals are impeded from having 2? Q2. It is a simple transaction. Adding to liquidity puts downwards pressure on the steem price. My proposal makes steem less liquid. Q3. Outsourcing of witnesses is an obvious step in the right direction. How can you defend a function being run by stakeholders? There is a clear conflict of interest. If you are so adamant to defend the status quo, why? Let's make it cheaper and more transparent. Q4. This is social media. It has been a bit of fun in the sun for the Game Theorists - time for them to stand aside and stop making money off other people's content. The heart and soul of steemit is the content creators. Whales are profiteering off that to a multiple which, if they knew would send an army of minnows to EAT every whale. Q5. It is Social Media. You have not addressed any one of these points properly - not ONE. WHY?
PS, I not that you did not address the rewards pool distribution - why?
As a leader in this organisation, your responsibilities are bigger than you are giving them credit for. If that is your response, then you are both wrong! I wrote a message to you in steemit.chat - why do we not work together? It seems that we have to be at war - I don't want war - I want a future for the whole platform - Q1. There is no advantage in multiple accounts under my proposal - explain why you think there is - voting? If you are found to have multiple accounts without just cause and permission, you forfeit-simple. Whilst on the subject, why do you let noganoo have 200 accounts whilst mere mortals are impeded from having 2? Q2. It is a simple transaction. Adding to liquidity puts downwards pressure on the steem price. My proposal makes steem less liquid. Q3. Outsourcing of witnesses is an obvious step in the right direction. How can you defend a function being run by stakeholders? There is a clear conflict of interest. If you are so adamant to defend the status quo, why? Let's make it cheaper and more transparent. Q4. This is social media. It has been a bit of fun in the sun for the Game Theorists - time for them to stand aside and stop making money off other people's content. The heart and soul of steemit is the content creators. Whales are profiteering off that to a multiple which, if they knew would send an army of minnows to EAT every whale. Q5. It is Social Media. You have not addressed any one of these points properly - not ONE. WHY?
PS, I not that you did not address the rewards pool distribution - why?