This sounds a lot like vote negation, which was suggested a while back but never saw the light of day.
I wonder if those against this originally may be having second thoughts.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
This sounds a lot like vote negation, which was suggested a while back but never saw the light of day.
I wonder if those against this originally may be having second thoughts.
This does not work like vote negation, however, in that nobody is locking up their SP to use against people. With this idea, the distribution system itself negates a portion of the vote rather than a user or group of users allocating SP to negate some of the user's rewards.
I go into more detail about the idea here.
Thanks for the info!