You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: What's Important to Steemit’s Longevity? - Inspiried by @anyx ‘Tragedy of The Commons’

Disagree. Many minnows will tire after posting low valued post but if they notice they can get curation rewards by buying a little Steem they will stay active. Presumably they'll buy from a powering down whale, thus redistributing Steem. Eventually after curating awhile they may post on some of the hot topics. We need a reason for people to join and stay active.

That's what makes networks valuable. Attention. Activity. Not Content

Think tv ratings or active user metrics from Internet companies. Activity is value not content. Content is just one way of capturing attention. Voting / curation rewards is another. Let's incentivize what we want! Activity!

Sort:  

It's actually two-sided, Steem gets value by grabbing attention... in other words many minnows' attention give it value. But Steem gets monetary value by selling that attention. If minnows' somehow get rewarded, they deserve it for giving their attention.

This is all about influencing and being influenced.