Wow. Didn't even think to check for myself. Thanks, I'll have to take a closer look, although reading some of the comments, it seems the 'nice' bar may have been set a little high.
I have a lot of time for @paulag and I'm sure she'll be revisiting some of the parameters, too.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I have taken the tool down @mattclarke, I ran an update on the query today and published to early. There has been a little drama over it but mistakes happen ( if I was a bot it probably wouldn't of happened lol)
"NO" (to quote you) ... If you were a responsible person willing to discuss the "mistake" you made and fix it ... it never would have happened.
But at that time, when I brought up your, what is now referred to as a "mistake" ...
you seemed to be indicating that everything was working just as you planned
... is that not the case?
At that time, before you got nuked, you said it was due to our account being "bots", which it's not.
When you were called out on that, you then said it was due to "duplicate" accounts (which every Community account is).
NOW ... for some odd reason ... it's a "mistake".
Anyway, I didn't want to let you just walk away free and clear with a revisionist history apology ... like all the others who pull shit like this on this platform for money.
@paulag when you decided to go public with your ridiculous shame tool, you became responsible for the information you spewed. Trying to hide behind 'mistakes happen' is a further show of irresponsible and immature actions - the same immaturity and irresponsibility that you showed when you published this thing in the first place.
I make it a habit never to criticise somebody while they're doing something I can't.
It wasn't my intention to criticize, just thought it was was quite a damaging list to have posted without running any checks.
Yes, she's certainly copped some flak for it.
It might be justified, I just don't feel qualified to hurl any criticisms myself :)