It certainly is. I have suggested the idea of increasing the curator share as a positive incentive against self voting, from 25 to 33%, an increase of 75%, by the way.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
It certainly is. I have suggested the idea of increasing the curator share as a positive incentive against self voting, from 25 to 33%, an increase of 75%, by the way.
I just wrote a proposal in my latest article Curation problems (incentive, rewards and self-voting) to increase the incentive for curators and reduce or even eliminate self-voting.
I would even go as far as to distribute 10% to authors and 90% to curators.
You mean exactly like now? :)
No no that, i mean there already is massive vote spam on high earning content :)