Sort:  

@steemcleaners has no reason to listen to me and I doubt they will reverse their decisions judging by past behavior.

Here's the deal:

I fully support flagging plagiarized material when it's proven to have been stolen, HOWEVER,
I fully disagree with flagging posts/comments where that proof is questionable.
That's how innocent 'til proven guilty works.

If @steemcleaners is actually proven to be flagging posts and comments randomly, then post the proof and let them defend their double-standand. Their credibility depends on consistent action. Disprove that and you (and you friends) have a chance at reversals.

Can you do that?