Then who's buying all the Steem? Steemit, Inc is selling to keep the lights on as well as many witnesses because they have costs to cover. If most high-earning bloggers are selling most of what they earn, too, then who's buying? Why hasn't the price gone to zero, yet?
I have no idea. But Steemit Inc’s programmatic selling isn’t only a portion of what is sold monthly and not even the largest portion.
There is still some utility to steem like steem monsters, bid bots was a huge demand to buy and own steem believe it or not, now there is some demand for curation rewards
Did people really buy STEEM to power up and to sell votes by delegating to bid bots? I doubt that. Practically all the whales were created when STEEM was mined back in mid-2016. They were also the largest vote sellers. It's never been the case that investors have been clamoring to buy STEEM to power up and sell votes.
The price of STEEM seems to move in tandem with the rest of the crypto space. It's simply speculative demand from unknown sources. Much of it languishes on exchanges. Only the liquid part can be bought and sold and the spot price is determined by that.
But if they mostly sold their gains, then there was no net benefit. What you earn from bid bot votes you can power down to buy new votes with. Positive ROI votes can make this profitable after a small initial investment. @likwid allows one to get all rewards in liquid STEEM. That decreases the required initial investment. That precisely is the essence of bid bot abuse, which accounts for a lot of the decline in STEEM's Coinmarketcap rank.
Then who's buying all the Steem? Steemit, Inc is selling to keep the lights on as well as many witnesses because they have costs to cover. If most high-earning bloggers are selling most of what they earn, too, then who's buying? Why hasn't the price gone to zero, yet?
I have no idea. But Steemit Inc’s programmatic selling isn’t only a portion of what is sold monthly and not even the largest portion.
There is still some utility to steem like steem monsters, bid bots was a huge demand to buy and own steem believe it or not, now there is some demand for curation rewards
Did people really buy STEEM to power up and to sell votes by delegating to bid bots? I doubt that. Practically all the whales were created when STEEM was mined back in mid-2016. They were also the largest vote sellers. It's never been the case that investors have been clamoring to buy STEEM to power up and sell votes.
The price of STEEM seems to move in tandem with the rest of the crypto space. It's simply speculative demand from unknown sources. Much of it languishes on exchanges. Only the liquid part can be bought and sold and the spot price is determined by that.
They bought and held steem to buy votes. The majority of the liquid steem on platform was buying votes.
But if they mostly sold their gains, then there was no net benefit. What you earn from bid bot votes you can power down to buy new votes with. Positive ROI votes can make this profitable after a small initial investment. @likwid allows one to get all rewards in liquid STEEM. That decreases the required initial investment. That precisely is the essence of bid bot abuse, which accounts for a lot of the decline in STEEM's Coinmarketcap rank.
I know, I wrote this because the asked why would anyone stake steem and I answered the questions for this account
Posted using Partiko Android