You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Steem 0.17 Change Proposal Introduction

in #steem8 years ago

Multiple Arbitrary Beneficiaries to Reward Payouts (needed for Busy's imminent launch)

The bold is not really true. Economic incentives for clients, etc. is more of a longer-term issue, particularly given the low price of STEEM and accordingly the low total value of rewards (and in turn the value of the small slice of that a UI would receive). I'm not sure that the Busy team would prioritize implementing this in the first public release even if the blockchain supported it (likewise for other clients)

Sort:  

It's not technically needed, true. And like you say, I don't know if Busy.org would implement it from the get-go. I'll ask. Edit: According to ekitcho, it's not a big immediate priority, but they are counting on the change [as part of Busy's model].

In any case, this is one change that gives more potential to Steem as a platform sooner rather than later because there are front-ends in the works that would benefit and be incentivized by it.

No doubt, I think it's a great addition.