I can tell you many were fooled , he even suggested he is Nathan Fillion on few occasions . Nobody thinks you are bread but if you put image of a real person then people assume it is you ....
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I can tell you many were fooled , he even suggested he is Nathan Fillion on few occasions . Nobody thinks you are bread but if you put image of a real person then people assume it is you ....
really? i hope that people don't think that @whatsup is a whale.
i always thought he is a fan of firefly.
:) right...? Am I misrepresenting myself?
well i never thought that you are one, but if man can be turned into a walrus, who knows :D
!dramatoken
did i earned some dramatoken? i never earned dramatoken. if i did i think i would be happy.
Yep working on getting dRAMA over here to send it to you.
They are in your steem-engine wallet.
no not really, just like the series and my first association was that he likes it. and maybe the old days of internet on forums where everyone had a nickname and a photo of well something.
i hope that no one thinks i am death. but that death was cool so...
I see this very differently than you do and I would say people shouldn't asume the person is the same person in the avatar, especially if the person in avatar is a celebrity and the account otherwise doesn't refer to the celebrity.
Bread is not a human being that is alive and earns a living from their image. Can I sell coke if I own coka cola and slap kim k on the bottle? This is a monetized website.. and yes we did think it was him.
YOU HAVE BEEN @kawaiicrushed LIKE THE LITTLE CONSPIRITARD BITCHES YOU ARE!!!
I would call bullshit here, but honestly, I totally believe you.
Science has gone so far I wouldn't be surprised if an actual bread would be on Steem, posting and earning.
Oh I see your point in that. The conversation could be seen if you originally assumed he is Nathan Fillion and meant your comment to him. But as I assume he's not Nathan Fillion AND your reply was for a gif with Nathan Fillion, I'm assuming your comment was directed at the real Nathan Fillion who is in the GIF.
If you see it like I do, markymark only pointed out that Nathan Fillion is not a failed actor, as you stated him to be. Not that he himself would be Nathan.
But if you assume he's Nathan Fillion, one could assume he could be talking about himself.
No, why should I be?
You don't need to be worried about my explanation even if you don't understand. I see your point and I understand it, but please understand that for most people, he didn't even try to say that he'd be Nathan Fillion.
Misunderstandings are quite common.