You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Steem - Less of a Good Investment than it was

in #steem6 years ago

If this Knight remembers correctly Ted - Dan had left before HF 19 took place.

I don't get what all the fuss is about - nothing great ever came easy and the changes are for the better. There will be plenty more setbacks before we go mainstream.

You are right SMTs are the future and the developers were right - you can't run infinite transactions on the system so they need an assigned value - and with this the value of SP grows.

SK.

Posted using Partiko Android

Sort:  

Investing depends on having a perspective based on what is actually occurring, not sentiments or preference born from things other than this.

So telling it like it is, is important. That said, I'd give it better than 50% that this ultimately does not matter. However, we could also say that it has already mattered. The reasons SMT's have not launched yet, is visible in this poor update with HF20.

From what I remember Dan may have still been consulting with Steem even though he had left. I'm not totally sure. He was still helping patch Bitshares in the last 12 months because he was talking about helping them on the side. If this was the case with Steem's prior update, makes sense, but you may be right, may have not been the case. Either way, it was smoother last time.