You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Who pays for the blogging and curation rewards? (Part 2)

in #steem8 years ago

It was always correct, even in Part 1, as I will explain below.

So youre saying everything was correct from the beginning.

Except the actual answers.

They were wrong.

But everything else besides the answers was right.

You didn't even take the time to check the equation and just jumped into making false accusations.

No, i just jumped in and said "your math is off" which it was. That was not a false accusation, it was 100% true.

It could have been off due to a typo or it could have been off due to a brain annuerism. It was off. ANd it caused you to come up with a completely wrong answer. Which i pointed out.

If you would have spent 5 minutes checking over your own work, rather than finding 26 different ways to call me a fuckwit, you would have figured out the error for yourself, when i pointed it out to you.

I told you flat out that i didnt get what you were trying to do. Just that you were coming up with the wrong answer.

Sort:  

But everything else besides the answers was right.

The equation is an answer. The numbers were typoed in the calculator. Why try to spin it in a negative light as something other than it was.

It could have been off due to a typo or it could have been off due to a brain annuerism. It was off.

Disingenuous. If the equation is correct, and you didn't even check the equation, then you have no grounds to be doing peer review. You would instead note that there is a typo in the numbers that were input into the equation and not false accuse that the underlying math of the equation is incorrect.

It is the equation that matters. The equation determines whether the mathematical concept of Part 1 was incorrect. The final numbers are superfluous. That is why we are required to show our derivations on math exams.

Please I think you know what peer review is and how it is done.