You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Who pays for the blogging and curation rewards? (Part 2)

in #steem8 years ago (edited)

so youre using the "same math" and getting completely different results. Results that were exactly the same as I told you you should be getting last time... and its somehow my fault that you couldn't get simple math right becuase you think my posts were "incoherent"

ANyone who looks at the comments in you last blog can clearly see that youre now using exactly the same formula that i gave you in the comments in your last blog.

YOure arrogance is just off the charts. So is your dishonesty.

and of course, anyone who corrects your glaring errors is a hater. because you couldnt ever be wrong.

Fact: you have different numbers here than you had in your chart in the first post.

fact: theyre exactly the numbers you would get using the debasement formula i gave you.

fact: you glossed over being 100% wrong about debasement rates.

Sort:  

ANyone who looks at the comments in you last blog can clearly see that youre now using exactly the same formula that i gave you in the comments in your last blog.

YOure arrogance is just off the charts. So is your dishonesty.

The blockchain has all the history. I wrote my equation in Part 1 before you wrote your comments in Part 1. I didn't edit my blog in Part 1 to change the equation after reading your comments.

You are off the rails man. Calm down.

EDIT: the most ironic is that I did cite you in this blog. I devoted an entire paragraph to acknowledging our discussion from Part 1.

So your accusation of me plagiarizing without attribution is obviously a lie.

And I did cite @arhag in Part 1.