The fact that there is a problem is doubtful. But I don't understand why you would even think that what you are proposing could or should be viewed as any kind of solution.
What you are suggesting to people is don't delegate your SP to the highest bidder. In other words you are telling people "Make less money!" Any solution that requires people to sacrifice their own market interests is:
- not a market solution so all the market talk after that is pointless and
- not a realistic solution because even people who see the problem and agree with it would be unlikely to hurt their own profits to help fix it for everybody
So I think we're back at the drawing board and the solution you are proposing remains unrealistic. The people who are idealistic enough not to use bots or not to delegate to bots are already not doing it. If you can't think of a real incentive for people to stop doing what they are doing, you are not really proposing a solution.
If you want to be part of the solution, do "ban" (whatever you mean by that) the bots on dmania as dmania is one of the sources of the lowest quality posts on the steem blockchain anyway. It's one of the legitimized ways to make shitposts, so people profiting by paid bots are certainly likely to be using it. Starting to fight the bots there could start the process of achieving what you were talking about as it will hopefully decrease their market share. Of course, that's also not very likely to work as they will just post from somewhere else and you are not doing it because it losing their votes on the dmania tag will only decrease the visibility of your whole platform. See, you are not wiling to do the personal sacrifice yourself, but you are asking it from others. I'm not saying it because I think anybody is obligated to personal sacrifices for the common good, but just to demonstrate how unrealistic and unreasonable your proposed solution actually is.
To be clear, I've never used a voting bot and I've never delegated to a voting bot, I don't even autovote anybody.