Then why upvote them $6 and not $0.05? It needs 2 cents to show a comment. He could have one account upvoting him with a small percentage automatically, but he votes with 30+ accounts and 6 dollars.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Then why upvote them $6 and not $0.05? It needs 2 cents to show a comment. He could have one account upvoting him with a small percentage automatically, but he votes with 30+ accounts and 6 dollars.
true, I guess his motivation is just sending it to the top so more see it. If you have money you are important here and deserve more I guess.
The rich having more power is definitely a property of steem. We could discuss if that is a bad thing and how it can be fixed but that would probably mean ditching proof of stake.
the problem is that we keep trying to use capitalism to fix the faults of capitalism. There is no "good" network we could make that functions on these ideals
Check out abundance societies, they are not capitalism.
I was talking about steem, but alright it sounds interesting
alright are you talking about post scarcity? I was hoping it would be something different but that's all that came up.
Steem is not capitalism. In capitalism, rewards would be given directly from the consumer to the authors. That is not the case here.
capitalism is private ownership of capital. I'm not talking about your special brand of "ultra-super free market consumer orientated trickle-down capitalism"
Yeah, but the rewards pool does not function as privately owned capital.
steem power
did you just tell a communist that he defends the ruling class? Disgusting
actually its so that he can ignore me long enough to get a foot hold and spread communism unchecked. Also I know he is doing it to support his own agenda but discussion is better than blind hate.
You have been flagged, likely because you are attempting to take advantage of the reward pool. Please see my daily post for more detailed reasoning. Thank you.