To get back to the first point. How would you like to limit SP in more deeper terms? So I can understand it in more depth. For me it's clear that a middle class here can greatly make things more awesome. But I do not believe we need to limit anything like SP for that to happen.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
This can be discussed of course but 100000SP should be max in my opinion. It is more than enough and STEEM should be with no limit.Even if someone can manage to have multiple accounts it is still not same like now when few persons can torture others that we are seeing now...
It's communism. I wanted you to explain why you think we need a cap on successful people? 100K is nothing! Why would anyone work hard if they know a limit like that exist?
You obviously don't know what is communism. Even in most developed democracies like USA and EU, there in anti monopoly agency that has to approve any company merger or purchase to avoid that one company becomes too powerful. Probably that is communism too...
There is no democracy. It's called plutocracy. Which is government by the wealthy. The so called democracy is just a front to give the illusion of choice. There is no anti monopoly Google is a monopoly already.
Agree, so you think that is good because we have same thing on Steem?
Yes I think that is good. Until someone can show me a system that is better than capitalism.
OK. I respect your opinion. I don't think there should be such huge disbalance of power anywhere, not just on Steem.
Cheers :-)