I don't see the utility of removing the 4 post/day limit, honestly. But I just see posting as creating contents, so probably I can't get the problem
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I don't see the utility of removing the 4 post/day limit, honestly. But I just see posting as creating contents, so probably I can't get the problem
I understood the reasons for limiting the number of posts, and am not sure of removing the limit will benefit the platform sine this can allow post bots to start spamming the system. But then again, it could also support Steemit to lift the limit. Think of a (digital) newspaper/ezine who like to use Steemit as one of their promotion channels. They may like to send 10 or more posts a day. I rather would have the newspapers/ezines than Steemers who take a URL from the Internet and post this without any comments. I know, lifting the ban may get bots in who will start posting URL's only, but lets try it and when the system gets spammed, a limited can be applied again.
I agree, but I would just unfollow all that clutter or mute people, I hope we don't get a instagram or twitter here, all that bs and reposting shit with goldfish attention span bugs me
If 3rd party content providers like magazine/ezines are allowed, it is all how you allow them and how they are in the user interface and what type of control you give to the user to either see there posts, or not. Facebook is sh*t, hardly any control. What about giving those content providers and Steemers 1) each content provider there own channel, 2) optin to the user for channel 3) maybe a general post channel, but again channel, like promoted a channel is in Steemit, you don't have to look at it. In this way, post will not be part of New channel, unless you as a user optin for the content channel.