It's simple:
Original steems! limited coins
(Image not shown due to low ratings)
(Image not shown due to low ratings)
(Image not shown due to low ratings)
Images were hidden due to low ratings.
It's simple:
Original steems! limited coins
(Image not shown due to low ratings)
(Image not shown due to low ratings)
(Image not shown due to low ratings)
Completely agreed! resteemed & upvoted.
Your reward for being in
Promotedis an upvote from @pipes.I run the @pipes account, and will answer you with my personal account, because I don't want to mix my opinions with the work I do with Pipes.
So, I think that the recent (or not so recent, but past) falling of the price is more difficult than just creating new STEEM. Also, STEEM creation is not for new account creation. Steemit, inc. has separate funds for that.
The price is not falling because of new users.
Why do you think that?
The price of Steem is not falling because of inflation. The inflation rate is much lower than the actual price drop. It is falling because the incentive to buy Steem as an investment is not big enough among those possible investors who know about Steem. New users aren't hurting the price because they are not the ones who sell Steem. It is much more the opposite. New users are more likely to buy a few Steem to test the buy function and because they think owning a little bit more Steem Power would be cool.
Think about that: It would just need 58 BTC to buy all Steem that are sold on Poloniex for under 10000 Satoshi. If Steemit suddenly gets popular and more new users invest a small amount the price of Steem would go up because of new users.
I agree with your opinion.
Current curation rewards (25%) and author rewards (75%) should be reversed.
Author Compensation 25% Curation Compensation 75%.
Authors should get preferential treatment but not more compensation than investors.