You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Hard Fork 21: A Case For the 50/50 Curation Reward Model

in #steem5 years ago

Thanks @crypto.piotr
Over all I’m confident Steem will be fine .
The reward curve change I agree with.
I don’t think we need the upvote change to 50/50. But we will just adjust like we always do .

One thing I will mention is that we should not be too harsh on the witnesses. Ever try getting a group of people to all agree on something. It’s not easy. I take my hat off to them .

One thing I will say though is that it is hard to get people to engage with you . After a year I’m only just starting to get a few regular people engaging with me .
So a few more people looking to start engaging would not go astray.
Although i don’t really consider getting an upvote engagement. Normally when I’m talking about engagement I’m talking about getting a comment on my content.

As for the bots, good luck getting rid of them . They will just adjust with the rest of us humans.

I read a few of the comments on this post and you have got some great engagement. I agree with some and disagree with others .

Anyways thanks for posting,
Have an awesome day!

Posted using Partiko iOS

Sort:  

Amazing comment @mickvir

Thanks for sharing your thoughts with us. I surely appreciate your time.

I don’t think we need the upvote change to 50/50. But we will just adjust like we always do .

You've lost me here. Can "we" actually upvote or decline some particular change? Is there any poll that allows us (common users) to have any impact?

One thing I will mention is that we should not be too harsh on the witnesses. Ever try getting a group of people to all agree on something. It’s not easy. I take my hat off to them .

Very true. I'm just sad that they seem to agree that creating system that would benefit current powerful stakeholders and reduce rewards for all those who create content (value) is what they actually all agreed on.

One thing I will mention is that we should not be too harsh on the witnesses. Ever try getting a group of people to all agree on something. It’s not easy. I take my hat off to them .

One thing I will say though is that it is hard to get people to engage with you . After a year I’m only just starting to get a few regular people engaging with me .

Did you ever consider sending memos to your most active followers with link to your new publications? That's the most efficient way of sending notifications and it increase chance of people reading your post greately.

Yours
Piotr

It's me again @mickvir

I also wanted to make some suggestion.

My impression is, that the hardest part of attracting attention on STEEMIT is the fact, that our audience have very little chance to actually find our publications. Lack of solid notification system is an obvious issue. And regardless how hard I would try - there is very little chance I would find out about your new interesting publications (my feed is just flooded with to many posts).

Please allow me to share some suggestion with you. If you would ever publish content related to blockchain, crypto, artificial intelligence, psychology etc. then perhaps you could simply send me memo with link to that post.

This way not only I would have a chance to read your publication, but I will also upvote it right away with 20k SP voting power. If I would consider it interesting then I may also share it with wider audience.

Please let me know what do you think.

Cheers, Piotr