You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Hard Fork 21: A Case For the 50/50 Curation Reward Model

in #steem5 years ago

Bid bot operators can start accepting lower bids to offset the loss of author rewards. They can easily afford it because thanks to 50/50 they'll earn more in curation rewards. @ocdb is still the best game in town as delegators get 90% of the bid and authors get the rest. There is no middle man taking a cut. Additionally, you have to be whitelisted to use the bot and if you use it on worthless posts, you can get kicked off the whitelist. The smallest possible of evils, in my opinion.

Sort:  

Dear @markkujantunen

They can easily afford it because thanks to 50/50 they'll earn more in curation rewards.

You nailed it. Some people think that bidbots will die. But all have to be done is simple: change algorythm behind those bots and play around with numbers. And you will make them profitable again + they will grow twice as fast.

Most STEEM will end up in hands of very few. That's the problem of HF21. Redistribution will sucks.

Piotr

Most STEEM will end up in hands of very few. That's the problem of HF21. Redistribution will sucks.

We can't know that. I don't know either, but I'm guessing that not much will change.

You received 50 Hobo tokens!