Something like that plus a
"downvote for excessive payout - payout correction / no reputation impact"
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Something like that plus a
"downvote for excessive payout - payout correction / no reputation impact"
Yep, something like that...
@alexgr this is kind of the type of thing I was trying to get to in that post. I think you two hit the nail on the head with your suggestions here. These types of changes are going to be needed if the platform is going to grow, could go bad, could go well, but if it's controlled properly I think it'll work out.
@alexgr
although I like this, who is going to moderate it? the problem still remains. people will follow the money no matter what. how about the power of the voter?
That looks even worse than the censorship bots. Who would be in charge of that monstrosity? Do they get to punish people that offend them? If not what stops them?
Are you gonna hire the Conde Nast censorship team to run it or go straight to Homeland Security for the wrongthink patrols?
This is the kind of SJW safe space crap that is ruining facebook and reddit. Grow some thicker skin and just ignore the people you don't agree with instead of trying to develop ways to label and censor them.