hmm. while i laud you efforts to support so many, I question if it is the best thing for content promotion. i like people but i don't always upvote things they do. it isn't always good.
imagine then, a world in which people work hard in the beginning then just shitpost to grab the autovotes. that is the world I see, unfortunately.
i think it is just life if you don't see it, don't get to it...
I agree, although I'm currently on a few curation trails to spread my vote around (though with a fairly low percentage). Also it adds weight to a few curation projects that I trust to curate. Besides that I am manually voting so far.
In terms of the layers abuse I don't consider handling automatic voting for people you support as a top priority. Especially since it distributes the rewards more widely than not anywho.
The other point is some people auto vote to send rewards back to the author as much as possible. (Early curation window). I suppose it really is on us to audit these continuously though.
people get busy, lives move on. i love the idea of auto-curation. but I am afraid of its implications. I like the idea of curation projects (more people, less likely to fall apart or change without notice).
I have had folks do that, but then i unvoted them.
Mostly they stop posting when they dont get more support than just me.
Ive got plenty of dead accounts in my steemvoter list.
i agree that it doesn't sound like your a problem. you are so active. if everyone was as active as you we wouldn't be having this conversation!
but i'm imagining a system that isn't dependent upon people to perform their duties as they should. any system will have issues, problems.. seeking to minimize the dependence how individuals interact with the system, so no matter what they do, it is within the realm of what the platform was intended to be.