How about a campaign for allowing n^x, or even any polynomial ?
n^2 was even worse tbh. If we had to choose a hardcoded number I'd go for n^1.3 and keep iterating dichotomically
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
How about a campaign for allowing n^x, or even any polynomial ?
n^2 was even worse tbh. If we had to choose a hardcoded number I'd go for n^1.3 and keep iterating dichotomically
Ok.
Anything higher than n^1 is fine for me.
Where do I have to sign up ?
A reward curve which started as n^2 / exponential (thus flat), and then later changed into linear would work against self-voting as well as excessive rewards:
'Conciliation' of the reward curves?.
Or, even better, an idea of @clayop.
N2 with the whale experiment was doing the trick just fine, it forced the hard fork so that reward pool rape could become a thing.
Does that disadvantage large investors?
Only if the price doesnt rise with all the happy new users that matter in the math.
Who puts $50k into a blogging platform anyway?
If they want to speculate in amounts larger than that they need to keep their hands off of minnow rewards.
When a whale votes everybody else loses money.
Not if they flag each other.
I LOVE flagwars ;)
Thats true, they could fight abuse with their millions rather than screw the little guys out of any rewards.
Yeah this.