Look, I'm not sure what you don't get here. Your arguments seem to be designed to be fighting against paid delegations from @freedom or something.
Utopian supports developers. Take this example
This is my friend Andres who I introduced to steem. Thanks to some of the work we are doing, including participating in utopian, he was able to move back to Líbano from Bogotá, reversing a major problematic trend of urbanization affecting not only Colombia but also most of Latin America.
Paying developers to help build a better, open world - does that sound 'capitalistic' to you?
The steem blockchain has been designed a certain way, @elear didn't code it. But he sure built a great app on top of it to spread the rewards, rewards coming from SP of donors who also agree that this is a fantastic project, to people doing good, open things in this world.
Don't like it? Find another blockchain!
I'm glad that you have benefitted from this arrangement.
I am not glad that half of the value my vote would have had was taken against my will to benefit you.
It is simply a fact in the math that delegating sp rather than holding that sp makes every other vote on the platform worth less in direct proportion.
This is a fact in the math, you dont have to like it, but to act as if it is not true is not the solution, imo.
Should i find a new planet while i am at it?