You do know it is super easy to create multiple accounts to "trick" that 1 person 1 vote thing?
I mean just look at people like @fulltimegeek with lots of accounts. I mean there are surely better examples but the fulltimebots are very easy to see/track.
Currently this exploit is facile. After SOC (SMTs, Oracles, and Communities) are introduced, that should no longer be the case except in communities that don't proscribe it.
@ned's statements in Korea make it very clear Stinc is intent on closing that loophole.
True & I can spend $25-200 to be top trending, so it should be for sale & gamed or...? We need a viable solution that is why I suggest both, make trending for 1 person 1 vote & let hot be value based like now.
You do know it is super easy to create multiple accounts to "trick" that 1 person 1 vote thing?
I mean just look at people like @fulltimegeek with lots of accounts. I mean there are surely better examples but the fulltimebots are very easy to see/track.
Currently this exploit is facile. After SOC (SMTs, Oracles, and Communities) are introduced, that should no longer be the case except in communities that don't proscribe it.
@ned's statements in Korea make it very clear Stinc is intent on closing that loophole.
True & I can spend $25-200 to be top trending, so it should be for sale & gamed or...? We need a viable solution that is why I suggest both, make trending for 1 person 1 vote & let hot be value based like now.
I agree, there should be some balance between 1 account 1 vote and total vote value in deciding which articles to go on trending and hot page.
Posted using Partiko Android