They only did it when the hack occurred and when they had a fix for the solution. I think they wanted to be seen as pro-active in handling a situation as opposed to waiting on witnesses to update.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
They only did it when the hack occurred and when they had a fix for the solution. I think they wanted to be seen as pro-active in handling a situation as opposed to waiting on witnesses to update.
the point here is: right now, with the whole software still in beta and very new, it might actually be a good thing that there is still some control from one or few individuals over the system. this makes it possible to react quickly to critical situations.