Why deliver below your advertised minimal ROI on a post older than 30 minutes with you being the sole curator on it?
I was aware of your post about giving a smaller vote when voted within the 0-30 minutes period, but why deliver below minimal return outside of it?
And to my bad luck, I caught the screen when sbd traded at 1.22$ instead of real time when it was 1.24$ and I forgot to capture it then, or I did, but overrode it in the OS' memory with something else.
I wanted a boost in reputation, so I sought to get a bigger vote with a larger portion of the vote's reward going to you.
More reputation for my money.
Instead, I got a vote just below the promised minimal return, and you still got the larger share of it.
Why deliver below your advertised minimal ROI on a post older than 30 minutes with you being the sole curator on it?
I was aware of your post about giving a smaller vote when voted within the 0-30 minutes period, but why deliver below minimal return outside of it?
And to my bad luck, I caught the screen when sbd traded at 1.22$ instead of real time when it was 1.24$ and I forgot to capture it then, or I did, but overrode it in the OS' memory with something else.
I wanted a boost in reputation, so I sought to get a bigger vote with a larger portion of the vote's reward going to you.
More reputation for my money.
Instead, I got a vote just below the promised minimal return, and you still got the larger share of it.
OK, let me help you.
$2.59 = $2.34 * 110%
(Your share = your payment * 110%)
Or 110% = 2.59 / 2.34
Bam, you got 10% more than what you paid. I can't see the problem. The ROI is as advertised.
You got a 100.00% upvote from @luckyvotes courtesy of @fersher!
You got a 80.00% upvote from @sleeplesswhale courtesy of @fersher!
Nice Post..!I have done with 100.00% upvote Thanks @fersher for sharing the post..!