No not at all. I'm saying that curators feel they are losing out because post rewards are still worked out using the 1USD = 1SBD, and so authors get more than the 75% rewards.
If the SBD price were taken from the internal market (for example 1SBD=1.12Steem( we would get back to a true 75/25 split on rewards.
The problem is that would reduce the supply of SBD and probably push the price even higher.
Ok, I think I get what you're saying.
I tend to sway the other way, we should increase the rewards for Curators (to include SBD) and increase the supply of SBD.
For sure. I was discussing that on another post. What if we could choose 100% SBD rewards? That would pump up SBD supply big time.
So you're talking split curation the same way post rewards are split. That would also work to even things out between authors and curators.
Yes, that is one suggested solution for Curators if people don't want to do anything about the peg a 50/50 Curator reward evens it up.
I understand why some rewards are paid in STEEM POWER because it ensures an amount is reinvested into the long term value of the platform. It makes a lot of sense, we just need to keep in mind that all the Stakeholders need to share in the platforms success rather than letting it get out of balance.