It involved pseudonymous identities representing 20 individual witnesses when in actuality they were all controlled by one person. That, to me, is clearly and irrefutably a Sybil attack. And yes, it was definitely stake-based as that's how DPoS works.
It involved pseudonymous identities representing 20 individual witnesses when in actuality they were all controlled by one person. That, to me, is clearly and irrefutably a Sybil attack. And yes, it was definitely stake-based as that's how DPoS works.
Yeah. I thought sybil just meant lots of fake accounts or an attack vector along those lines.