I see this very differently than you do and I would say people shouldn't asume the person is the same person in the avatar, especially if the person in avatar is a celebrity and the account otherwise doesn't refer to the celebrity.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Bread is not a human being that is alive and earns a living from their image. Can I sell coke if I own coka cola and slap kim k on the bottle? This is a monetized website.. and yes we did think it was him.
YOU HAVE BEEN @kawaiicrushed LIKE THE LITTLE CONSPIRITARD BITCHES YOU ARE!!!
I would call bullshit here, but honestly, I totally believe you.
Science has gone so far I wouldn't be surprised if an actual bread would be on Steem, posting and earning.
Oh I see your point in that. The conversation could be seen if you originally assumed he is Nathan Fillion and meant your comment to him. But as I assume he's not Nathan Fillion AND your reply was for a gif with Nathan Fillion, I'm assuming your comment was directed at the real Nathan Fillion who is in the GIF.
If you see it like I do, markymark only pointed out that Nathan Fillion is not a failed actor, as you stated him to be. Not that he himself would be Nathan.
But if you assume he's Nathan Fillion, one could assume he could be talking about himself.
No, why should I be?
You don't need to be worried about my explanation even if you don't understand. I see your point and I understand it, but please understand that for most people, he didn't even try to say that he'd be Nathan Fillion.
Misunderstandings are quite common.