Why are you such a hater? Please don't spam my blog with incessant incoherent walls of text as you did in Part 1. Organize your comments well as @arhag did above. This is supposed to be a community process of uplifting each other, not a dick measuring contest. I tried to be cordial with you in the comments in Part 1, but you went off the rails with false accusations and incoherent arguments.
i think its super shitty to dodge the issue and try to say you were correct all along when your math was clearly in error
Please see my discussion with @arhag above, so you can realize that my math is not incorrect.
now youre posting numbers you came up with using the formula i gave you in the comments. Frankly, its borderline plagarism
Nonsense. I am using the same math that I had in the Part 1 blog. You can see the equation for the more precise model is the same, except I correct the typo from 365 to 364 for the last term, which had nothing to do with the issues you were raising. All I did was clarify the math I already had in Part 1 (and added new sections about other topics).
You continue to make false accusations. Please stop doing that.
And please stop stalking my blogs making false accusations in my past 3 blogs (excepting the silly one I made with a Locomotion video for fun).
Edit. Flagged for failure to cite. incredibly dishonest and its really unfortunate that founders and a top witness support this.
Edit: and so now that I proved in my comment response that you were making false accusations, you further go off the rails and downvote me out of spite even though I had told you I would not downvote your comments because I didn't want to incite a war with you.
so youre using the "same math" and getting completely different results. Results that were exactly the same as I told you you should be getting last time... and its somehow my fault that you couldn't get simple math right becuase you think my posts were "incoherent"
ANyone who looks at the comments in you last blog can clearly see that youre now using exactly the same formula that i gave you in the comments in your last blog.
YOure arrogance is just off the charts. So is your dishonesty.
and of course, anyone who corrects your glaring errors is a hater. because you couldnt ever be wrong.
Fact: you have different numbers here than you had in your chart in the first post.
fact: theyre exactly the numbers you would get using the debasement formula i gave you.
fact: you glossed over being 100% wrong about debasement rates.
The blockchain has all the history. I wrote my equation in Part 1 before you wrote your comments in Part 1. I didn't edit my blog in Part 1 to change the equation after reading your comments.
You are off the rails man. Calm down.
EDIT: the most ironic is that I did cite you in this blog. I devoted an entire paragraph to acknowledging our discussion from Part 1.
So your accusation of me plagiarizing without attribution is obviously a lie.
And I did cite @arhag in Part 1.
unflagged. I didnt see that comment. i still think this post, and referencing me in it and "correcting your typo" without ever admitting you were wrong is shitty, but you came up with slightly different numbers than me so maybe its not a total cut and paste.
we im done with this
Ty. Best to you. I don't hold grudges. You pushed me too far which is why I took the issue more publicized. I am done with this argument also.